几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 06:29 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 i posted this on wrong forum

i posted this on wrong forum
has to do with ibc importance factor
i would appreciate some input here.
ibc table 1604.5 category iii "structures that represent a substantial hazard to human life...but not limited:"
and then it lists various occupant loads. i have an occupant load of 128. as far as i am concerned, this is a substantial loss of human life and falls into the "but not limited to" category, therefore, falling into category iii.
any input?
i agree!
if you choose the lower catagory, i can just invision a lawyer or plan checker being able to rip you to shreds. "what do you mean it is not a hazard to human life....."
maybe, i am just being paranoid....
is it just a bad choice of wording or is that really what was meant?
devil's advocate - so then where do you put the cutoff point as to how many people are ok to die?
my personal opinion is that 1 death is 1 too many. so now do you really want to design everything to category iii, including parking garages and barns?
apparently, people wiser than us have put the limits as whats acceptable in the code. if a lawyer is asking me questions, my response would be "i dont write the code, i just follow it."
the "but not limited to" part of the code is where the question comes up. i think 128 people is significant.
owners probably do not wish to pay for the impact of designing everything to category iii. the code merely picked a number to identify the dividing line between the categories. it is not implying that 128 people is not significant. yes, wording in the code can use improvement but take it for what its worth.
it is entirely up to the engineer to design above and beyond the code minimum requirements. however, owner may not appreciate it if he finds out the design is too conservative.
with a 128 occupant load, i would design for category i. is there some other reason why you are considering a higher category? with respect to occupant load, category ii is for occupancies of 300 and more. you are definitely below this threshold so why push yourself into a higher category if you do not have to.
agreed on all points. wording could be improved.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】oddbtextiterator returns wrong value yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 08:18 PM
【转帖】end of forum service yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 09:03 AM
【转帖】are there any forum rules of use yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:25 PM
【转帖】c++中动态内存分配引发问题的解决方案(转) huangyhg vc编程 0 2008-10-27 11:37 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:52 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多