几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 07:37 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 information on column design unity equation

information on column design unity equation
i would like to know the significance of aisc asd equation h1-3 (unity equation for compression members) and the preceding equations h1-1 and h1-2. when are these equations used and what is the significance of one over the other? i have not been able to get a real good understanding of these equations. i have read the asd and it's commentary. i'm just looking for another interpretation. any information anyone could share would be helpful.
thank you.
hello frostrobn,
suppose you have a member which is subject to both compression and bending, then the unity equation goes like this - you can work in `stresses` or `forces`, it doesn't matter.
(actual compression / allowable compression + actual bending / allowable bending) <= 1.0
i am not familiar with the standards you are quoting, but they should be similar to the above. some times other factors are introduced, such as 0.5 x actual bending, etc. etc.
the equation i have given is pretty general and usually gives a rather conservative approach to the use of the unity factor. other factors are introduced for a more realistic approach and to give a greater economy of materials used, usually at the expense of more calculating power required.
if your standard gives more than one equation for the unity check, you can use whichever one suits you best, ie. the quick approach, or the more exact approach. if you have time, check them all out and then pick the one which gives the greatest economy of material. i usually just plum for the quick, conservative check as being simple and easy to use. how accurate do you want to be anyway!
hope this helps.
regards,
neilmo
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
equivalent frame for rc column design loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:48 PM
designing columns for concrete buildings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:12 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
cantilever steel beam at column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:40 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:25 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多