几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 09:35 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 lateral bracing for crane beam

lateral bracing for crane beam
when providing lateral bracing for a crane beam (under-riding hoist), which is best?
1. a channel welded to the compression (top) flange with legs down, or
2. horizontal bracing at appropriate points.
part of the answer depends on what type of crane you are talking about, monorail or bridge crane with underrunning hoist.
on bridge cranes for the runway girder and the bridge girder there are usually very few places to tie to so a channel is welded to the top of the beam. this does two things. for the runway girder the common practice is to take out all the horizontal loads in the top flange rather than go through all the calculations for torsion applying the load at the top of the rail. for more information see engineering journal second quarter 1998, "design of crane runway beam with channel cap" and engineering journal 4th quarter 1982 "tips for avoiding crane runway problems". a good design reference for runway girders is aisc design guide 7 "industrial buildings". part 2 of design guide 7 is industrial buildings with cranes and gives lots of good information and design requirements for the runway girders and building.
on the bridge girder there are several trains of thought. one is to do a single beam with or without a channel cap. adding the channel cap can often give you a lighter beam because of reduced allowables in a plain s or wf section due to the compression flange buckling. weight can be critical. a single beam is easy construction but can have some problems in the connection of the beam to the end trucks to prevent skeewing.
the other thought is to have your main beam without a cap designed to support all your hoist loads and have a second light weight follower beam with a lattice work connecting the top flange of the main beam to the follower beam. having two beams gives a more rigid connection to the end trucks and prevents skewing. the draw back is more weight and more labor in putting the lattice between the two girders. which item you choose depends on money, weight restrictions, speed and capacity of your crane.
if you are talking about a monorail, i have not seen monorails built with channel caps. the monorails are usually designed to be supported at the required brace points. for monorail design see the previous thread from today on monorail design.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
lateral bracing for beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 09:34 AM
effective length of beam subject to lateral torsional buckli huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:40 PM
beam bracing questions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:45 PM
aisc appendix 6 - beam bracing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:34 AM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:38 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多