几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 10:44 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 lintel bearing

lintel bearing
the approach that i see engineers take seems to vary and i have often wonder about this:
how many engineers extend bottom plates to the end of beam lintels?
how many engineers require that the bottom plates extend only to the face of the opening and lintels shall be welded down to bearing plates at each end? if yes, is this because you are designing buildings in a seismic zone or high wind area?
is your approach the same on both interior and exterior lintels?
check out our whitepaper library.
hi, jike,
i generally assume the plate is just the width of the opening, and does not extend into the support. of course, the torsion at the end of the lintel (if any) must be resisted, either by welding to a bearing plate, or without a bearing plate, if there is enough dead load coming down from above the end of the lintel.
daveatkins
i usually extend the plate the full length of the beam. an exception might be if there are steel columns on either side of the opening, in which case the bottom plate could stop at the edge of the opening. but i like for the plate to have full bearing to help provide torsional resistance. at some point you need to transition from the beam and plate bearing with no anchorage to requiring welding to an anchored bearing plate. i usually do this for lintels greater than 10' unless there are horizontal and vertical bars above and beside the opening to "tie" the wall.
i also use a full length plate and no bearing plates. i like the simplicity of fabrication and installation. i try not to have torsion on a lintel.
our projects are in a non-seismic part of the country. if i was working in a seismic area, i probably would weld them down as dave atkins does.
if i do have significant torsion, i am somewhat skeptical that the masonry backup (usually 8" cmu) can actually resist the torsion. i would prefer to attach the torsion resisting lintel to a steel column at each end if necessary.
i typically follow mike's method. however, i never weld the lintel to the bearing plate. i always bolt. during construction i have had times where a welded lintel will bust out the face of the wall due to thermal expansion. (even when wall is grouted solid.) the bolts allow enough "play" so the beam can expand and contract without causing damage to the block.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
ibc 06 table 1804.2 bearing capacities allow. or gross huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:36 PM
brick lintel huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:50 PM
bearing plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:17 PM
bearing capacitypressure of existing asphal huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:15 PM
allowable bearing capacity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:51 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:10 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多