几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 10:49 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 live load means how many people

live load means how many people?
if analysis of an existing structure reveals a live load capacity of 20psf, but the code mandates a live load for this structure of 60psf (balcony fixed seating), how many people is 20psf?
i know asce uses 60psf to include dynamic forces due to people moving around on an elevated floor. i believe that i'll have to take the number of fixed seats that are existing, ratio them by 20/60, count the number of seats left, and make that the restriction. any other ideas?
check out our whitepaper library.
that seems like a bad idea. i don't think you can get around that 60 psf. people can still go on to your balcony, regardless of what a sign says. do you really want to take the risk that a bunch of teenagers will think to themselves... "let's test that limit"?
and that "live load" could literally be just that: jumping, people crowding literally right next to each other right at the railing's edge, jostling and perhaps even carrying another.
we've seen the shenanigans going on at parties and athletic events.
are you going to gamble they won't happen on your balcony just because of a "sign" on the wall?
so you have "fixed seats" - how are people going to get to and from the seats, how many other people are going to crowd around without ever sitting down in those fixed seats?
60 psf will be exceeded but the reserve strength, (safety factor), should suffice on the rare occasions when overloaded. building to the code is considered good judgement.
my former boss one mentioned that a movie theatre lineup is about 100psf, for what it's worth.
crush loading in a passenger rail vehicle is often taken as 6 persons per square meter, each at 95th percentile male (220lb) - sorry about mixing units...
tg
i tried something similar to this once. i explained to a code official that a client would limit storage live load in a room by creating wide aisles between shelving.
the code official would not accept this. on my project, he said a room originally designed for 60 psf live load simply cannot be used for storage without reinforcing the floor
i know of no code-acceptable loading for people in the 20psf range (not stairs, not balconies, not observation platforms...anything). if an average person of say 175 lbs, wearing size 10 shoes, puts both feet closely together, his loading on that (roughly) square foot is 175psf. obviously you won't pack that many people of that size so closely together, but you could give each of them say, three square feet of space and that wouldn't be unreasonable for a gathering. then you have roughly 58psf. that's without any dynamic consideration.
where people are involved, and can gather in close spaces such as a balcony, a crosswalk, or mezzanine, a high unit load is necessary. go back and read a few of the articles about the hyatt-regency walkway failure.
people will ignore posted signs as racookepe1978 noted.
if you are considering rating an area that you know will hold people and it's capacity is less than the code-allowable (in this case much less), you are being irresponsible and you are not meeting an acceptable standard of care. if anything ever happened and this came out through investigation...and it would, your actions would likely constitute professional negligence.
tell the owner it won't work for the application. if you're the owner, it won't work for the application.
there was a whole bunch of people killed in chicago a few years back when a balcony collapsed. they were having a party on it. as i re
i was doing some renovation supervisions at a university recently when i noticed that all the rooms had a capacity sign out the front. i didn't check the existing 1970's design but i hope the person limit wasn't for structural reasons.
even though i would agree with ron, i believe you need to open a dialogue with your code official. there opinion as per dave's post would be very important.
when in doubt, just take the next small step.

asixth...most occupancy limitations are for fire egress purposes.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
live load deflection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:48 AM
green roof live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:09 PM
existing steel column analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:59 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
100 or 100 = 25 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:27 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:24 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多