几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 02:11 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 minimum distance from base plate edge to foundation edge 9pr

minimum distance from base plate edge to foundation edge (pr
i am reviewing some drawings and there is a thing that worries me. please excuse my bad technical english.
rhere is a cantilevered column loaded with moment and shear and almost no axial force. the load is from one side only (no earthquake analysis). the moment couple is from forces of about 200kn (45 kip?) with distance of 42cm (16 1/2 in).
the column is to be installed almost at the edge of a big foundation and the tension is from the side farther from the edge of the foundation. the edge of the base plate that is bearing on the concrete however is shown to be aligned with the edge of foundation.
the engineer has shown a 'skeleton' of reinforcement that is 12.5x12.5 cm (5x5 in) square with rods n12 (1/2 in) with shear reinforcement 8mm at 20 cm (1/3 in at 8 in) distance. this skeleton lies in concrete under the bearing area.
now - the question. is this sufficient to prevent the concrete from crushing - shouldn't there be an analysis for slipping of a pyramid under that force? is there a minimum edge distance for the bearing side of the plate?
i can provide whatever additional information is required to clarify the question.
many thanks
mike
i don't think you would have to worry about the concrete crushing, it would be more of a shear failure with a triangular portion shearing off at the end.
i haven't ever really seen footings with shear reinforcement. if your footing has it then i would assume the engineer considered what you are concerned about.
i guess i messed up the words by crushing i did not mean consuming the local compressive strength (which seems to be the term). i meant what you described - a triangular concrete prism breaking from the foundation (is breakout the term for this?) .
what made me curious was the very little distance from the edge on which this compression load is distributed - can i really rely on full compressive strength development when being only ~5cm (2 in) from the concrete edge?
many thanks for your reply
mike
mikesg,
you need to check the concrete pullout and side face splitting of concrete tor tensile and shear forces . if you have access to aci-2005, follow the steps of appendix-d.
lokstr
thanks for your reply.
i have checked pullout and breakout strengths of the tensile anchors and capacity is times larger than the demand. about side face splitting - as i mentioned the tensile group is on the farther side from the edge, about 50cm (20") from the side - i.e more than the minimum of 6d recommended in design guide 1, which is 18cm(6") in my case.
mike
mikesg,
i think there is a little confusion regarding what you are concerned about. are you concerned about the crushing of the concrete under vertical load or are you concerned about the lateral load on the anchors?
crushing of concrete - unlikely for footings as long as the base plate is of sufficient size.
lateral load - 1/3" at 3" ties look like they have been designed specifically for this.
regards
csd
the check for that is the two-way shear capacity, also known as punching shear. that check is in the aci and should be in whatever code you are held to.
if i re
thank you all for your answers.
csd72, i am concerned about the vertical load. lateral load is relatively small: 55kn (12.5 kip) and there is a shear key welded to the base plate.
ucfse, do you mean to check similar like for breakout of the concrete pyramid (or foundation under a heavy loaded column) or something else?
jstephen, you are right, this erection issue should be taken in consideration.
i will discuss with the owner and check on-site whether a larger distance can be provided - even 5cm (2") will make me feel much more comfortable.
many thanks once again
mike
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
design approach for anchor rod plate washers huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:12 PM
base plate thickness and bolt preload huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:27 PM
base plate design- simple design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:25 PM
base plate design ignores corners of base plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:24 PM
base plate anchor rod hole size huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:04 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多