几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 03:45 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 nchrp report 350

nchrp report 350
i am designing an extended curb that will anchor a test level 3 traffic rail per the nchrp 350 spec and need an impact force. i know how to calculate impact forces, but the report only designates weight, initial speed, and impact angle. i need change in velocity (lateral) for the calculation. the report does give limiting occupant speed and decel (g's) and i am thiking of using those. any thoughts or sugguestions?
check the aashto specs for guardrails...it gives you what you're looking for.
gerald,
aashto requires a design (unfactored) impact load of 400 kips for structures adjacent to a roadway that are not protected by an independent barrier.
or you could assume a final velocity of zero and use f*deltat = m*deltav (impulse relation from high school physics). the smaller the deltat, the higher the f.
jeff

thanks for the input. i havent found the reference in my google searches on aashto guard rail specs. 400 kips for a tl3 design seems very high. the tl3 is a 2000kg pick-up traveling 100 km/hr with a 25 degree impact angle. for a complete stop, yes the loads are very high, but for a glancing blow, veloctiy change is much smaller, but what is it? the 12 m/sec occupant limitation yields 106 kips, which seems more reasonable.
gerald01,
if i recall correctly, the 400 kips was for a tractor-trailer impact or a train impact.
but when the contract doesn't specify the requirements (as a recent letting project did), i bid it high to cover my butt. didn't win the job, but i'm not eating the cost of missing it from the design-build item.
jeff

ok, that makes sense, this will be a secondary road with lower speed limits. i just found a detail on the txdot bridge standards web site that i believe is useable rail anchorage curb for box culverts that i believe i can use without undue concern:
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
geotechnical info on structural drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 02:31 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:06 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多