几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 11:39 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 passive pressure

passive pressure
i am looking for opinions others may have for "clean" stone acting to withstand building lateral loads. the site condition i am analyzing is the passive pressure of a 12" layer of clean stone as a result of lateral forces from grade beams. to describe the constraint conditions, there are multiple grade beams with finished floor 6" above clean stone. the 6" is a gap, no soil.
can this clean stone be compacted to an affective density to provide passive pressure? does the gap create an unrestrained condition, i.e. the stone will tend to push upwards during a lateral event?
thanks in advance.
check out our whitepaper library.
i have asked the soils engineers that i work with the same basic question, and they showed me that in order to develope full passive pressure you need significant displacement of the structure into the resisting soils, even if you thoroughly compact the soil. however, you don't need much displacement in order to be able to reliably count on half of the passive pressure. the army corps. of engineers in a guideline for the design of retaining walls recommends using the at rest soil pressure for sliding resistance to be conservative, but says to never use more than 1/2 of the full passive pressure. this assumes that the resisting soils will not be removed.
not like, since it has no confinement.
thanks guys.
i thought a little about how i worded the question and the stone pushing up now does not make sense to me. the grade beams are rigidly connected so if one grade beams moves, they all do. either way, clean stone with a gap under the plank, to me, seems to not provide support. i have been authorized to use 400 lb/ft^2/ft for this passive pressure? seems high to me.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
octagon footing base pressure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:53 PM
lateral to vertical pressure ratio for concrete slurry-which huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 09:53 AM
at rest vs active earth pressure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:48 PM
added internal pressure to wind load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:11 AM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:38 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多