几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 03:22 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 pt unbonded tendon placing and layout in 2 way slabs-long

pt unbonded tendon placing and layout in 2 way slabs-long
i am interested in everyone's opinion on tendon placing options within the banded-distributed layout. most literature supports a standard scheme of placing distributed tendons+top rebar within the effective width first, followed by all banded tendons+top rebar, finished up with all remaining distributed tendons. would it not be easier to just place all banded tendons+top bars and then all distributed tendons+top bars? i realize this would result in less drape for the banded tendons. i have found that most designs require top bars to extend more than ln/6-so doesn't this reduce drape in the uniform tendons in the standard scheme or do the uniform tendons placed after the banded tendons push the top bars in the banded direction down in a concave shape to maintain a larger drape since they are placed after the banded tendons+top bars?
my second question is in regards to bottom bars. i have seen recommendations for placing them uniform in the unifom tendon direction and banded in the banded tendon direction but that would leave large areas of slab without reinforcement in two directions which could be problematic for temp reinf. in the banded tendon direction, non-rectangular slabs, point loads, and other misc detailing problems. do people use uniform layouts of bottom bars in each direction (albeit at a large spacing relative to a conventional slab)? and if so, do you reduce the drape accordingly since you can't get tendons through the bottom mat since it would be placed before any tendons?
basically, how varied can your layout be relative to the standard information printed in pt design literature while still mainting the basic prinicples of banded-distributed to reduce tendon weaving to a minimum. thanks in advance.
greg
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
pt tendon detailing adjacent to elevator shearwalls huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 03:21 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:23 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多