几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 05:44 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 reinforcing steel braced frame diagonal

reinforcing steel braced frame diagonal
i am working on a high rise addition, where the two upper floors of the existing high rise have braced frames. the diagonal members in these braced frames are overstressed when the addition loads are added.
the diagonal is a w18x143. i find that addding a c10x30 to each flange will increase ry sufficiently.
my question: do the channels need to run the full length of the w18? i am only trying to increase ry, not add area to the section.
daveatkins
hi dave! if the channels are not needed to carry stress they can be stop just short of the connections. are the connections adequate?
whew! that is a good question!
are you modeling this brace in? if so, is it inactive under vertical loading? if it's not, it will resist the compression of the columns due to the upper floor loading. i don't let the braces take vertical forces due to the gravity loads when i model something. might make me old timey, but i want to make sure my column can take the vertical load as is intended, and the braces take the lateral load as they are intended.
i know aisc published some papers in their engineering journals. one is titled "allowable axial stresses in segmented columns" and was published first quarter, 1979.
i have it in pdf format. if you need it, let me know and we'll find a way to get it to you.
dave, i would agree with jike. if you are just trying to increase ry and eliminate buckling concerns the added shape can stop just short of the connection.
if you run the channel even shorter, then the traditional buckling equations aren't valid as they are based on mono- properties along the length. this then would create a similar problem to that of step columns in buildings where there might be a crane beam at mid-height or something.
dave,
i would stop them 6" to 1' from each end.
then it is no different to the situation with gusset plates each end.
dave, just a thought. if you increase ry, does rx become the controlling r for your situation?
rgerk,
excellent question! i did not think of that, and i will check. but the existing braces are w18x143, so i don't think it will be an issue.
daveatkins
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
reinforcing steel beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:44 PM
fire damaged warped frame steel beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 11:51 AM
expansion of single storey steel frame industrial building huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 09:12 AM
braced frame brace element question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:37 PM
beams braced with a welded flat steel plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:12 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:12 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多