几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 06:28 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 response spectrum analysis with a braced frame

response spectrum analysis with a braced frame.
i have a question about response spectrum analysis (as per asce7) in general. i have a short (20 foot tall frame) that is braced in both directions. a equipment fabricator wants to do a response spectrum analysis as per the code to get as low as possible seismic load (for his piece of equipment). originally, i would not permit it because i thought we would use a moment frame for lateral resistance, and since any change in the frame's stiffness (i.e. changing a beam or column size here and there before the issue date, which is months down the road) would alter our response. but now, with a braced frame, i would think changing beam member sizes would not significantly impact our response. i would think the first few modes would clearly dominate. thoughts? opinions?
a single story braced in both directions would merely behave as if it were a block setting on the ground or rock. the first mode would be the predominant response and the coefficient would be as high as allowed by the code because of the stiffness.
there would be no benefit to the equipment fabricator at this point to perform a rsa.
regards,
qshake
eng-tips forums:real solutions for real problems really quick.
even changing the type of frame (moment or braced) is not going to change the design of supplier's equipment. as far as i know these eqp supplier neither ask you about the natural freq of your structure nor they model the structure in their design. they simply use the equation given in the code asce07/ibc/ubc which make use of sds (design sprectral response at a period of 0.2s.
qshake, that is kind of my p.o.v. on the subject as well. thanks for your input.
by the way qshake, the reason he wanted to do a response spectrum (in the first place) is because he got too much load from using equation 13.3-1 (in asce7-05) for non structural components. but even using response spectrum there are certain code minimums (for the base shear).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
response spectrum analysis its resullts huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:28 PM
equivalent frame method for analysis of continuous slabs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:48 PM
equipment frame analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:42 PM
braced frame brace element question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:37 PM
6-story braced frame analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:53 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:36 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多