几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 08:47 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 seismic design, r coeff. question

seismic design, r coeff. question
i'm designing a 15 ft high single story addition in sdc d, sug-ii, with log columns, glulam beams, and log "k-braces" for lateral force resistance. the roof will be 3x6 t&g. in asce 7-02, table 9.5.2.2 i'm trying to determine what r coefficient to use and i don't see any that look applicable. they all seem to apply to steel, concrete, masonry, or wood shear panels. does anyone have any experience with this?
gib-
you are talking about a timber frame, in essence. agree that the chart isn't much use for that particular lateral force resisting system. there doesn't seem to be a lot out there about timber frame design.
however fyi some research results on timber frame lateral design at the following link:
scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-08142002-232925/
good resource for timber connection designs is timber framers guild,
ubc 1997 or cbc 2001, volume 2 has those r values based on your structural building components. seismic design book by lindeburg and baradar-8th edition describe the procedures. you may view this book at
fndn,
thanks. it was there in the 1997 ubc, in table 16n. r=5.6 for building frame system - heavy timber.
is that r value ok to use if it isn't listed in the ibc? just wondering if we can use r values that are not listed in the ibc, but are valid in other codes?
i don't see why not. there isn't much of anything on log construction in the ibc, so you have to find resources elsewhere. i have used the '97 ubc before when i ran into something that wasn't covered in the ibc. as long as the item isn't prohibited by the ibc, i would prefer to find another reference than try to make an educated guess.
gib2;
i should have added chapter 16 on my previous post. i am glad you found it.
thanks, gjb. when the code isn't explicit on something, i use other references or codes for guidance. just wondered what others thought about that.
according to ibc section 1614.1, exception #3, wood framed buildings constructed in accordance with section 2308, conventional light framed structures, do not have to be analyzed in accordance with section 1616.1, structural design criteria.
if your building can be considered conventionally light framed, and you abide by the detailing required in chapter 2308, you will not have to perform a seismic analysis.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
aisc 341-02 seismic provisions with asd design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:31 AM
【转帖】decimal dimensioningfractional equivalents yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:23 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多