几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 09:01 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 seismic options design

seismic options design
we are at early concept stage for a building in the uk which will require to be designed for seismic conditions.
we currently have a 9m (29.5ft) square structural grid and a regular building shape. i'm giving some thought to flat slab construction, possibly post tensioned.
this is where i hit a dead end as i have limited knowledge of either seismic design or pt. i'd apreciate your comments and/or advice.
for seismic purposes (as i understand it) the columns need to be strong so that plasticity develops in the floor - for beams i think i understand how this could be achieved but for a flat slab?
now for lateral bracing, i'm thinking shear walls, and i'm thinking the architect won't like them! are there other options?
clearly, proper design will not be contemplated until we have the appropriate information and skills. rest assured this is for a reputable client and i work for a reputable consultant!
thanks in anticipation.
dear pba,
i do not think that we have in the uk a bs that takes into account seismic loads in the design of concrete
dradk,
you are correct - bs8110 does not allow for seismic loading and thus cannot be used directly. advice to date suggests we design to aci 349, for the seismic condition. this is an american code with which i'm currently unfamiliar! this is feasible but would require separate consideration for building regulation compliance.
we would have something of an easier time with a steel frame as bs5950 can be used for seismic design with additional recommendations taken from american lrfd code - indeed we have done so in the past.
steel frame gives a potentially increased structural zone and limits our options for utilising thermal mass heating/cooling. it has not however been ruled out...
ec-8 is currently being sourced to assess it's validity to this project, but the client recommendation is asce 4, which again we will be obtaining.
the requirement to design for seismic is client imposed and reflects the nature and importance of the works to be undertaken in the facility. i can say no more.
i see....then it seems that you don't have any other option really......other than using the american code. i could suggest some other european codes but i do not think you can find them in english.
since i am not that familiar with the uk construction system......aren't you going to have any problems with the british building authorities for using a non-british building regulation?
good luck!
it has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity
- albert einstein
california is the most seismically active region in the us and so you may contact
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
reinforced concrete building design step-by-step huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:12 PM
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
contract issues - structural steel connection design in the huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:40 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:30 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多