几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 09:12 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 seismicwind design

seismic/wind design
if you have a building whose overall lateral design is controlled based on wind force, however the seismic loads are pretty substantial as well, shouldn't the anchorage checks for concrete be investigated for seismic anyway? the ubc gives several equations for these anchorage checks. i have seen a lot of engineers decide that wind controls a building design and design all connections based on this. i think you could have larger seismic pull out forces (due to the back and forth motion) for example at connection of diaphragm to tilt walls. does anyone else agree?
check out our whitepaper library.
if you have to check some seismic loadcases, the anchor of its (seismic) forces no doubt need be checked acording to the seismic provision applicable. if done this wind controls anywhere and any detail then it would be how the others say, but in other case, no. furthermore, for some hypothesis that need to take unto account the real layout of reinforcement, the biggest and real reinforcement from wind or eq should be input for the anlysis or check.
haynewp,
one of the most ignored issues in structural design is in areas where wind loads tend to "control" the design over seismic.
the correct procedure is to develop the loads for both wind and seismic and then design your structural elements for the controlling factor. too often, engineers determine that the wind is just a little larger, overall, than the seismic, and then proceed to design the entire structure for wind only, ignoring the seismic issues that still actually apply.
for example, while an overall wind load may control the design of a lateral deck diaphragm and brace design, the code requires, in the case of the sligtly lower seismic loads, to factor up the seismic in connection design to ensure that the
jae,
a good reply.
regards
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
relevancy of code date-opinions sough huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:51 PM
reinforced concrete building design step-by-step huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:12 PM
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
calculations personal tool or public record huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:10 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:53 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多