几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 10:52 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 simpson mst type strap installed over gypboard

simpson mst type strap installed over gypboard
does anyone know of design values or test info on
simpson mst type strap installed over gypboard.
simpson will only give a value for their nail and/or
their strap when applied over wood framing (df,syp,spf)
what reduction should be taken when a strap is applied
over sheetrock which is applied to cdx shear panel which is applied to 16"oc df framing.
the length of the nail has been increased 5/8"+ to achieve full penetration into wood.
bending of the nail will control in this case, since the drywall offers little confinement to mobilize the shear.
suppliers such as simpson do not rate such an application because of the potential to develop out of plane bending when the drywall doesn't keep the anchor flat because of localized crushing of the drywall.
why not cut out the drywall under the anchor and replace with wood blocking of the same thickness? this will keep the manufacturer involved in the event of a failure because you are using their product in accordance with their instructions.
another approach, if you want to take on the liability, is to downrate the capacity of the anchor based on the bending of the nails as compared to just shear in the nails. compute the bending stresses, compare the load required to bend to the load required to fail in shear and reduce capacity by that ratio.
thanks, ron.
one supplemental thought...if you cut out the drywall, why not just attach the anchor to the supporting sheathing/studs. you could then re-patch over the slot that you made to re-finish the wall.
the sheetrock slot to accept the strap and rock over would obviously be the engineers delight. but on a larger scale, numerous multi-story buildings have been built and stand as this construction technique has been accepted practice for years in the portland/wa area. recently red-tagged project is standing still since the inspector has requested someone answer his concern.
additionally: wall panel manufacturers are looking for non-reduction solution since they prefer to pre-fab shear-ply and gyp-over without pre-strapping (shipping/alignment problems).
this is one of my pet peeves. the common contractor lament ("we've always done it this way and we haven't had a failure yet") doesn't hold water. show by testing or calculations that it works, or revise the detail to comply with manufacturer instructions.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
post-installed anchors huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 01:50 PM
【转帖】asmeb107.100-2002-b94.9-1999标准 huangyhg American standards 1 2009-09-01 09:28 AM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:36 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多