几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 11:42 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 slip critical connections vs bearing type

slip critical connections vs bearing type
consider a standard hole 3/4 inch diameter a325 bolt in shear.
allowable stress for bearing type (n) connection is 9.3 kips, and for slip critical (f) connection is 7.7 kips
slip critical connection are required to be inspected in the field for correct tension with torque testing devicess, or with direct tension indicators, etc., while the bearing type is not required to be inspected.
so how come the n connection which doesnt have to be checked gets a larger allowable stress then the slip critical connection which is inspected.
i would think that something which does not require inspection would get a lower allowable stress.
it is because of the intent. in a bearing connection you can use the plastic shear strenght to the factored level, and the equivalent thing is portraited in getting your allowable shear strength. however, the main requirement of a slip critical connection is to avoid the connection slippage at service level, that for most of the cases should cover a very big percentage (say over 99.5%)of the actual peak situations experienced in service, and typically not less than 95% of the expected peaks of solicitation that corresponding to the code-specified loads. to get such reliability, experience proves that lesser allowable strengths must be permissible. of course you will have for the same geometry an equal or bigger limit load for the slip critical connection (with proper element), but this becomes less paramount once we consider that the true goal of the slip critical connection would have failed.
bearing value seems awfully low compared to slip critical...
ishvaaag is right - the two have different limit states. the bearing capacity is based on bolt shear - a limit state where the bolt literally fails.
the slip critical connection limit state is slippage, not bolt failure. so the load is lower because after torqing, the load that causes slip is lower than the load that causes bolt failure.
the difference between the n bolt and the slip critical is not that great as the n bolt has a further penalty in that threads are not excluded from the shear plane as is the case with the x bolts.
you still have to check the connection for bearing if originally designed as slip critical in case slippage occurs.
additional comments on slip connections can be found here
if you are interested
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
slip critical connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:42 PM
slip critical connection failure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:41 PM
designation of bolted connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:07 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:43 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多