几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:33 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 strengthening existing steel members

strengthening existing steel members
i have an existing 2-storey steel structure which is to be extended upward, making 3 floor levels. upon analysis of the existing members to support the new loads, i have found that a few of the beams and columns are inadequate - there are either deflection issues or the member fails in bending moment capacity.
i have been told that the way to strengthen the members is to just determine what the optimum member size would be, find the section modulus of that optimum size and then add steel plates to the flanges and webs of the existing beams/columns in question to increase the section modulus accordingly. i just wanted to know if this is all that's required....matching the section modulus.
any help would be greatly appreciated. thanks so much.
increasing section modulus increases strength, increasing moment of inertia decreases deflection. adding plates will help both, but you will need to check both. welding steel plates to existing members may or may not be the most efficient way of reinforcing your structure. field welding is tedious and expensive.
have you checked the columns? footings? lateral system? are these beams that you are proposing to strengthen now roof beams? if so, what about the secondary
thanks hokie66 for your response.
i have modeled and analyzed the entire structure using ram structural systems. most of the columns are ok as is but some of them require strengthening. the footings are ok to support the new loads and braced frames are used to resist lateral loads.
the beams that need strenghtening are currently roof beams but the structure was originally designed with the intention of going up, so there is currently composite metal decking with concrete topping on the roof which will now become the third floor level.
then why are the beams and columns overstressed? increased load due to different useage, or code changes?
mike mccann
mmc engineering
have you considered llr for the major beams and columns?
mike mccann
mmc engineering
i would say that it is more involved than that. i've done strengthening of existing members and, at least in my experience, it's not that simple unless you're jacking the structure to relieve the existing stresses. if you jack the structure to relieve existing stresses, then yes, you're procedure is fine. if you're not, which in my experience is more likely, then you have a little more work on your hands, but not too much. additionally, plates usually provide only a marginal benefit. i've always ended up having to use a wt section.
here's the procedure i've used. first, find out the fy of the existing beam. next, i determine the dl stresses in the member. i typically will select a wt size that seems reasonable to me - i wish i could offer more guidance on selecting it, but you'll get a feel for a good place to start as you do more of them. i find the new section properties of the built-up member. now i check stresses at 3 places: the top of the beam, the bottom of the existing beam, and the bottom of the wt section. in my opinion the only one that is really necessary is the top of the beam - for most cases. i say most cases, because under typical loading for a simply supported
to add to strleit's post, i have used the attached spreadsheet to aid in my analysis / design. it really does a nice job of delineating your stress checks. i have a modified version of that spreadsheet, so it better fits my specific needs (different types of reinforcing schemes and so on).
otherwise, like strleit, i have also done numerous reinforcing of existing steel beams and his procedure is the same as mine. one of the "benefits" of retrofitting older buildings, right?
joel berg
hokie66...that's a formulaic consideration. with some minor exceptions, you can't increase one without increasing the other, though admittedly not necessarily at the same rate (i.e. adding plates to the bottom flange only).
"...there is currently composite metal decking with concrete topping on the roof which will now become the third floor level."
it's not just a matter of adding plates here, especially if there are studs in addition to the metal deck. is the floor fully composite now, or partially composite?
mike mccann
mmc engineering
connections !
check them as well
or not composite at all?
it's the decking which is described as composite, not the beams.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
sandwich existing wood beam with steel plates huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 07:57 PM
reinforce existing steel huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:10 PM
existing steel column analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:59 AM
existing steel bad jois huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:59 AM
coverplating existing columns huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:16 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:02 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多