几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:46 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 strip footing required reinforcemen

strip footing required reinforcement
to all,
i am designing a concrete strip footing. the thickness of the concrete is roughly 2.25'. this is set to match an existing railroad foundation nearby). i designed the main bottom reinforcing to carry the moment applied (#6 @ 6"). also, i designed shrinkage and temperature steel in the other direction (top and bottom) by simply using 0.0018bh. my boss mentioned to place reinforcement in the top direction (same plane at the #6 @ 6") and he said there is a note in the aci 318 code about using a percentage of the area of steel required for the main reinforcement. this is due to the high footing thickness and some reinforcement is needed at the top of the footing, however even if it is minimal. i cannot find this section and wanted to know if anyone out there has a direction to lead me. thanks.
check out our whitepaper library.
i am not aware of this requirement in aci 318 either.
you only need reinforcement where there is tension. as long as the top surface never goes into tension you should be ok without any reinforcing there as long as you can meet all of your shrinkage and temperature requirements in the bottom mat. if your footing thickness was so large that your shrinkage and temperature steel became unreasonably large at the bottom, it would make sense to have bars at the top face too.
with that said, for a thick section i could see having bars at the top surface as a matter of engineering judgement, but i'm just not aware of that being required by aci 318.
he may be thinking of the practice for walls 10" and thicker for 50% of what is required for the primary reinforcing to be installed on the non-tension face of the wall. so if #5 @6 vertical is required for bending on one face, the opposite face will see #5 @12 vertical.
then again, he may not...
mike mccann
mmc engineering
there is no requirement for top bars if they're not needed.
no requirement, but if there is any chance for localized settlerment, the installation is a good practice.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
unless specifically needed stick with bottom reinf only. additional steel for chairs, tie off and increased lap lengths seem like a waste of steel.
why not check as plain concrete with this thickness? the majority of strip footings i see have only nominal longitudinal bars and no transverse bars.
i guess your boss was talking about distribute the t&s steel in the longitudinal direction. it is an old practice, i don't re
thanks all for the help. there is not exactly anything in aci 318 regarding this issue. however, in aci 360r-21 it mentions that s&t steel "should be at or above middepth of the slab on grade, never below middepth". that is why we decided to put some s&t steel in the top...only a portion of the required area of steel.
we wee able to come with a solution though... thanks again for all the help.
a slab-on-grade is a different animal. the steel in a sog is placed closer to the top to control how much the cracks open up. it's also usually a non-structural element, and the amount of crack control steel is usually very little as compared to the shrinkage and temperature steel in a structural
what is the cantilever distance on the strip footing... if 2.25' thick then with wall thickness the footing can be about 4'-5' wide without reinforcing... as plain concrete.
dik
if you don't need top bars, don't put them.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
strap footing vs. combined footing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 10:25 AM
modifying strip footing on 9 storey building huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 02:43 PM
footing is too small for residential addition1 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:04 PM
design of continuous or strip footing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:37 PM
demolition of existing wall footing to install column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:07 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:25 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多