huangyhg

structural analysis of snowzilla
i posted this in a different forum - hopefully this forum is a better place to post it.
in anchorage, ak, a man built a 25 foot tall snowman in his front yard. the city disapproves and says the structure is unsafe without doing any sort of engineering analysis.
if i was an alaska pe, i think this would be a very interesting engineering analysis. however - i don't have any textbook references on the structural stability of snow. i am speculating that a person would look at the load bearing capacity of snow and the estimated weight of the snowman to determine if the lowest amount of snow was likely to fail under the weight of the snow.
can anyone offer any insights on this?
you can see an article about it at
that is hard to say. as i would suspect that the stability of the structure would depend on many thermodynamic factors that may change by the hour or even minute. if one insists, then i would say that experimentally is the way to go.
cheers,
a search like this will be somewhat productive:
building snowmen to do some experimental testing sounds great. i actually built three snowmen about two weeks ago.
snowzilla is actually a really interesting engineering study. growing up in snow country and having a lot of hands on experience with snow, i cannot believe that a large snowman presents any safety risk to anyone around it unless the snow is compacted sufficiently to become ice. the reason is compressed snow has a very low compressive strength and breaks apart upon very small compressive loads - thus preventing injury.
however, if the snow becomes ice due to rainfall or hoses, then falling ice does present a potential safety hazard because it does not break apart when falling.
the mechanics of sliding snow (avalanches) is a serious topic in engineering and i can do some research there. my professors at montana state university did considerable experimental research in this area. yes, they built a shelter in snow, instrumented the hillside with various sensors, and forced an avalanche to occur using dynamite. very fun.
hmmm, i wonder how i could write a report on this?
my goal would not be do guarantee the structure would not collapse. instead, i would only need to show that the probabiity of causing personal injury would be small if it did collapse.
i like the ideas. i presume because of the nature of the topic it would not be too difficult to publish a work or a few papers if you can get some interesting results.
by the way, i always thought that compressed snow has a higher compressive strength then if it weren't compacted.
cheers,
yeah, i agree that compressed snow has more compressive strength than uncompressed snow. i wasn't trying to compare the compressed and uncompressed above, though, i was just saying that it is low in general. (low as compared to steel, ice, concrete, etc).

ok, understood
forget about engineering analysis to provide safety....just provide enough room all around it that if it collapses, it clears all adjacent property, etc. pretty simple....
i think it should be packed with black powder and launched. preferably at the guy that says it has to come down.
richard a. cornelius, p.e.
local city councils are funny.
i can't imagine snowzilla is an actual problem in and of itself, but the real problem is the guy has been cited for too much trash in his yard, etc. he owes like $200,000 to the city in fines that they have levied, and he simply refuses to pay for them.
so now they say his snowman is illegal because it is "structurally unsafe." i have no idea what the merits are in the fines they have levied, but i don't like city councils playing engineer and making engineering assessments on the public safety hazard without a pe license. that's not their place, and frankly, the state board of pe's should nail them for practicing without a license.

__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]