几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 11:25 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 structural independence of water retaining structures

structural independence of water retaining structures
hi,
it is generally said that it is advisable to have the structure for a pool/tank independent from the main structure.
i understand the concerns associated with differential settlement and movement which may cause cracking in water retaining structures if they are not independent.
my question is how far would one take this discussion. i am doing a house which has a pool right up against the building. actually the architect shows that the building and pool share a wall. the buidling is to be constructed on a very dense compacted sandstone an i would'nt imagine too much differential settlement.
does anyone have special thoughts on whether the structures should be independent or not and if not under what circumstances.
thanks
i would keep them separate to protect both. different loading conditions resulting in different soil pressures and localized settlements.
i would not want permanent water in the vicinity of my house foundation either as the bearing pressure for the house foundation could be impacted.
also, the closer the pool to the house, the deeper the house foundation has to be to avoid loading the sides of the pool.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
outside of earthquake and hurricane zones with water table far below the foundation, which is sitting on stiff ground without settlement problems, i would say it (bind together) is structurally do-able, though not advisable. you should engage a geotech to exame the site to better handle the settlement issues.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
structural ii huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 11:25 AM
sea water retaining structures huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 08:18 PM
retaining wall retaining water huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:41 PM
pe structural i or civil huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:54 AM
base moments in square water retaining structures huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:22 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:25 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多