几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 04:25 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wo way slab

two way slab
i've got a two-way slab system w/ bearing walls. i am approaching it with the direct design method (wall strip, middle strip, moment coefficients, etc.). my question is, how should i treat the values of the negative moment right at the walls?
find a job or post a job opening
jeff:
there is a few things you need to look at. first off is what kind of bearing wall are you using. if using masonry i would not count on any negative moment at the wall. it would be very difficult to develop the bar into the block. if the wall is concrete you will still have to develop the bar into the wall and design the wall for the moment the slab will apply on it. if you have a simple support no moment will develop however if it is very stiff you could say that the exterior edge is fully restrained. (see aci commentary 13.6.3.3.)
personally i tend to be conservative and design for no restraint for my positive moment and fully restrained for negative. i just hoping to avoid cracks.
good advice, would this mean re-distributing the moment (co-efficient derived) that was intended to go into the walls--into the slab?
ex.- a.c.i prescribes that 0.7 of mo goes to the interior negative moment. a pca design guide then breaks down that 0.7 into percentages that go into either the wall, the edge strip, or middle strip.
if i suddenly assume none of the moment is going into the wall, wouldn't the slab be required to resist much more negative moment?
thanks.
jeff:
you have never told me if it is a concrete or cmu bearing wall you will be using. if it is cmu i would design the interior using 0.75 mo. if it is concrete use 0.70 and a minimum of 0.30 for negative at the exterior. (this matches 4 in the tables. we assume the wall is similar to a stiff beam.) please review 13.6.4 in aci especially 13.6.4.3. i think this is what you are looking for.
take care at the corners where two walls intersect at 90 degrees. this area tends to have lot of shrinkage cracks.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
slab-on-grade w embedded rails huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:30 PM
slab on grade problem huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:24 PM
post-tensioned beams parallel to slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 01:51 PM
how to thicken an existing concrete slab on grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:54 PM
crack in old floor slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:20 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:37 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多