huangyhg

usgs software to calculate ss, s1, sms, sm1, sds, sd1 based
i just found this and thought it was pretty cool. it is better than looking at the maps.
i'd also suggest becoming familiar with the ways to evaluate the site class using shear wave velocity. in my area, the spt value method for determining site classificaiton is pretty conservative versus the shear wave method. in other words, the shear wave provides a more refined evaluation of the site classification to determine fa and fv. if you have a good geotech, they can provide guidance regarding whether the spt values appear good enough for the shear wave to make a difference.
i have been using the usgs program for quite a while now, and i use the lat/longs istead of zip codes. the zip code areas are just too large.
please do not use the zip code, you must use the lat and long to get accurate information. i checked some designs where the structural had used a zip code and the values where more than 20 percent to low, not a good thing. the location given by the zip code was more than 14 miles from the actual site.
also be on the lookout for folks using the wrong maps. some states adopted the more recent ibc/usgs maps while the permits were under the '03 code...since the maps changed in between that period, the values were off high by 20%+ (changed the sdc). this is sort of the scenario that will likely happen again based on my first post above since the maps have been updated and will be adopted "very soon" (in next year or so...maybe it will hold off until the ibc'09 comes out in jan '10--i think that's when the next cycle is completed).
unauthorized reproduction or linking forbidden without express written permission.
i suggest using the lat/lon feature of that...it makes a fairly significant difference at times. also be on the lookout in the next year or so of the revised maps (preliminary maps can be found on the usgs website at
i have been using the usgs program for quite a while now, and i use the lat/longs istead of zip codes. the zip code areas are just too large.
please do not use the zip code, you must use the lat and long to get accurate information. i checked some designs where the structural had used a zip code and the values where more than 20 percent to low, not a good thing. the location given by the zip code was more than 14 miles from the actual site.
also be on the lookout for folks using the wrong maps. some states adopted the more recent ibc/usgs maps while the permits were under the '03 code...since the maps changed in between that period, the values were off high by 20%+ (changed the sdc). this is sort of the scenario that will likely happen again based on my first post above since the maps have been updated and will be adopted "very soon" (in next year or so...maybe it will hold off until the ibc'09 comes out in jan '10--i think that's when the next cycle is completed).

__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]