几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 05:58 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 using sog

using sog
there is a concern at our company about using the abbreviation of sog for slab on grade. is there any reason not to use it, legally or in the effort to reduce confusion?
do you have an abbreviations page or section within your drawings? that can be used to apply to things like this.
we do have a abbreviation list we stick on our drawings. our main cad manager mentioned he might be getting rid of the sog, he cant recall but re
no offense to your cad manager, but i would think that having a definition clearly indicated on the plans would not be a source of trouble.
just to make sure, you could put a big note on the plans like this:
sog means concrete slab-on-grade. see the notes and details pertaining to its requirements and construction. if you don't know what an sog is after all this, either you are an idiot or a ccc* or both.
*completely clueless contractor

i was once reviewing a set of drawings... i forget the exact circumstances, but the confusion of abbreviations went something like this:
t.o. = top of
t.o.s = top of steel
long story short there were some drawings which made the "t.o.s" elevation "appear" to be the top of slabfff"> elevation... the drawings were labeled properly but this still lead to much confusion... i have seen tos mean either top of steel or top of slab.
so, for clarity purposes that may be something to be aware of, but i can't think of an acronym with sog which would cause legal troubles

i always thought that t.o.s. meant "totally over-designed structure"....at least that's what my architect clients tell me.

tell them the only thing that gets totally over-designed but totally under-detailed is the architecture.
jae, you're in rare form today! i loved the ccc thing. as a federal government puke, we try to use abbreviations as little as possible. those that we do use are found on a legend sheet. we use the united states national cad standards (usncs) for all projects. although sog is common in the industry, it is not included in the accepted list within the usncs.
for top of slab, i use t.o.c. for top of concrete (not to be confused with table of contents). t.o.c. is used whether it is on slab-on-grade or top of concrete filled deck.
provided that sog is defined in the list of abbreviations and no other disciplines defines sog as something else on their drawings, i do not see any "legal" reasons to not use it.
i have not reviewed the usncs abbreviations list but i expect the list to be partial at best. there are no legal reasons to restrict yourself to the usncs list.
the use of abbreviations are acceptable on plan drawings where there are many repetitions. on detail call-outs, notes or full sentences, i do not use any abbreviations.
vmirat-
do you know why sog isnt on the usncs list?
bd9607,
it has guidelines for developing abbreviations. here's the list:
the terms included in this module were selected using the following criteria:
- the term has six or more letters. terms with five letters or fewer should not be abbreviated.
however, certain commonly used terms (such as "build" and "center") have been included.
- trade association acronyms, such as ul, astm, and nfpa, have been included if the organization publishes standards likely to be referenced on drawings.
- common english language terms have not been included. some examples are "afternoon"(pm) and "central standard time" (cst).
- abbreviations representing professional licenses, certifications, or
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
sog shear reinforcing under wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 12:19 AM
sog punching shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 12:19 AM
radiant heat on sog huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 04:08 PM
no cracks in sog huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:27 PM
dowels 2 sog huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:09 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多