几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 06:04 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 value engineering session

value engineering session
i just had a value engineering session on one of my jobs and they came back with a few comments. see below: if anyone has some suggestions on how to respond, i would appreciate it.
1. eliminate upturned keys in concrete starter walls.
2. reduce wait time between adjacent concrete placements from 10 days to 3 days.
3. use steel bar joists and metal decking in lieu of pre-cast concrete planks for roof construction.
4. do not use hydrophylic expanding rubber waterstops.
5. use fly ash in concrete.
check out our whitepaper library.
1. would lead to poor waterproofing.
2. can construction sequencing be changed to lessen the impact (i.e. do two sparate stages at once or start the upper shoring at an earlier stage).
3. give them an alternate typical design so that they can price it up.
4. not an option.
5. dont know the specifics so cannot comment.
1) i'm not a believer in keys anywhere. but you'll still need the starter walls.
2) we use three days sometimes, but the contractor needs to be pretty good.
3) it will save money now, but will cost money for future remodels.
4) nope, no, nada, nein, no way.
5) less than 20% is no problem. anything more might increase cure times (see 2 above) or cause other issues.
generally agree with jed, but on item (2) it really depends on the type of joint you are talking about. three days should be plenty for any strength issues. if the issue is shrinkage, there is a paradox: the earlier you place the second element, the less cracking due to restraint parallel to the element, but the greater propensity for the joint to open perpendicular to the joint.
i think it depends greatly on the intended use of the structure. ilike up turned keys as wter is not as likely to be trapped at the bottom of the key. should the water freeze, the concrete can be damaged. however, i agree with jed that in may situations, you do not need keys. don't know the particulars of the situation, but if someone wants to substitue, let them propose the budget alternative cost. be sure he ads fees for redesign. i think the use of hydrophylic water proofing again depends on the application. simple rubber waterstops are often used. how important is it to ensure no water gets through the joint? fly ash is a common substitue. the concrete supplier may have priced the concrete planning to use some fly ash in liue of cement. it has pluses and minuses. for one it will finish well, but is more difficult than just cement. it also depends on what type of fly ash. slag is another common substitute. i would talk to the concrete suplier's quality control engineer about the mix.
1. eliminate upstand key and use bentonite strip if waterproofing is required.
2. three days is likely ok. if not a strength (flexure and particularly shear).
3. depends on the use and cost, but steel bar joists and deck is likely less costly, but, you may end up with with a lesser roof.
4. hydrophillic rubber waterstops are ok; depends on how critical water penetration is; what is their alternative?
5. fly ash is good and depends on the type of concrete. not uncommon in these areas to use 25% fly ash with type 10 (gu) to provide equivalent of type 50 (hs) concrete.
dik
1. nevered used projecting keys, always recessed keys.
2. most concrete mixes will get strength in 3 days now, but tests should confirm that. also recommend some way of alternating pours to maximize time between adjacent pours as strength is not the single factor in placing new concrete adjacent to existing. just start playing with the extended reinforcing and see what happens.
3. agree with dik that overall durability and use should be factor what roof selection is.
4. water stop depends on application.
5. fly ash is not bad overall especially when dealing with mass pours. however, this issues goes back to item 2 wherein concrete strength is affected.
regards,
qshake
eng-tips forums:real solutions for real problems really quick.
added note... with high amounts of fly ash, strength gain may be slower...
dik
also... hc slab can reduce the thickness of the roof construction by a foot or so... also building height... this can offset added costs.
dik
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
switching engineering fields, looking for advice huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 12:34 PM
does one have to be a p.e. to do value engineering huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:16 PM
cad and engineering fee spli huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 06:05 PM
【转帖】哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-28 12:13 PM
哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-26 06:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:19 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多