几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 08:57 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 where is the cut line

where is the cut line
i am having a discussion with my boss about where we place a plan "cut line" on a structural plan. the issue arose when we made the drawings for a plank and block school building. here are the arguements:
me: i believe the "cut line" plan doesn't actually exist on a a bearing wall structure. instead we are actually seeing a "reflected" plan. therefore, we are showing what is above as solid and cutting what is supporting above.
boss: my boss subscribes to the architecture practice of placing the cut line above the floor 42" and only showing the walls above the plank.
my problem is (2) fold.
1.) if i show the walls above the plank, one would have to flip back pages to see the walls where the plank bears. in addition, openings shown on the plan actually happen above the plank, therefore do not affect the plank shown on that specific drawing.
2.) the bigger problem is, i disagree with my boss. i realize that i have to do as i am told. however, in previous projects of this nature, i used the "show walls below plank" method and did not have a problem, so i know it works.
any information about technical drawaing standards for structural drawings (as opposed to architectural drawings)would be appreciated. my feeling is that structurally we are actually showing a "reflected" plan, not a "cut" plan.
i welcome the discussion!
i agree that a structural plan should show the supporting structure, whether walls or beams. this could be done as a reflected plan, which i've used before, or as dashed lines (hidden detail), which is used where i work now.
reflected plans may tend to confuse some contractors.
we show all the supporting walls below the floor structure and we also show the walls above if they are load-bearing walls for the structure above.
in many cases they are the same, but when they differ greatly, you need to be sure to somehow show which are above and which below.
paritions are either not shown, or shown half-tone.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】hatching entities yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 12:01 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
[求助]请教高手,这段程序能否简化一下呢? yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-26 02:45 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:59 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多