几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 09:42 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wind load coefficients for awningcanopy

wind load coefficients for awning/canopy
i am looking for pressure coefficients compatible with asce 7-95/98 for open awning structure. this awning is a monoslope (up to 45 degrees top slope) welded tubular structure with a fabric cover on the top sloping surface and sides (open bottom).
check out our whitepaper library.
garnereng,
you may have noticed that your posts keep disappearing from this forum. that happens when other
austim,
thank you for the heads up. i just discovered this site yesterday and am totally new to what happens here. thnak you for the advice as to the multiple closely related posts. i had no idea that that was a "no-no".
thank you.
garnereng...the procedure austim described is not necessarily a no-no, it's just that it might imply you are one of a group who might get red flagged routinely such as students looking for answers to homework questions. assuming you are not in that group, i'll give it a shot.
a canopy or awning would typically be an open structure with a monoslope or arched roof as you have described, though other configurations certainly exist. looking at a monoslope roof on an open structure, the coefficient, cf, will vary from a low of 0.2 for a flat roof to 1.3 for a roof up to 40 degrees (30 degrees max. in table, +/- 10 degrees allowed), depending upon its length to width ratio. as the progression of the table would imply, a roof at 45 degrees would likely carry a higher coefficient than shown in the table, considering the length to width ratio of the canopy.
here is where a bit of engineering judgment comes in. since the table doesn't specifically address your condition, you have to look at what might be a proper and conservative application of the intent of the coefficient. consider the table for freestanding walls and solid signs as a place to start for your comparison. this table is also dependent upon a length/width comparison and its coefficients, cf, range from 1.2 to 2.0.
your application is likely somewhere between these two tables...monoslope roofs and solid signs. using the projected area of the 45-degree face, you can compute a length/width ratio for the solid sign application, and given the canopy dimensions, you can compute l/b for the monoslope condition. all of this will likely lead you to a rational coefficient of somewhere between 1.0 and 2.0.
you can apply similar logic to your other configurations.
i will add a caution that if you are not familiar with computing wind loads on structures, you should have someone on a local basis (in person) mentor you through the process, as there are numerous variables to consider that cannot be adequately covered in a query to a forum.
good luck.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
wind load calculation for belt conveyor truss design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 09:41 PM
question on wind load provisions of ibc 2000 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 03:57 PM
load combination questionpoll huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:01 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
british wind loading codes huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:42 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多