几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 仿射空间:CAX软件开发(三)二次开发与程序设计 » CAD二次开发 » SolidWorks二次开发
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-13, 10:14 AM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】defining a weight for a specific part for analysis

defining a weight for a specific part for analysis....
lets say you have a solidworks part and it's completely solid.
in the real world the part is not solid but complicated; has mechanical parts and space inside, for example a pump and it's motor.
you're not concerned about this now. the sw parts are for layouts and general shop drawings. in the future though the engineers want to do an analysis and are concerned that there would be inaccuraces because of this.
can you define a weight for the part regardless of the volume, density, etc.
i'm thinking you can do this.
"can you define a weight for the part regardless of the volume, density, etc"
??
make a 2d drawing and add a note "weight: (###)".
or, as most do, model the part as it is in real world.
my model, do it right the first time.
chris
solidworks/pdmworks 08 3.1
autocad 08; catia v5
i've always measured the volume of my envelope model and calculated a "pseudo" density to make the weight come out right.
timelord
with the part open, go to tools > mass properties > assigned mass properties

i meant for something like fea analysis.
so, even if you don't manufacture the pumps and motors you should still model the interior parts?

do as cbl suggests, as long as you are not performing any analysis on the "less detailed" itself.
"art without engineering is dreaming; engineering without art is calculating."
one limitation to cbl's method is that the center of mass may not be in the center of the volume. my recommendation however is to use cbl's method and leave the mass center concern to the person doing the analysis. it would be ashame to expend effort to get the mass center right and then have it not be necessary.
also, in older versions of sw, cbl's method does not exist... in that case, use timelord's recommendation. timelords method along with changing the density of different bodies of a multibody part (i seem to recall this being possible but have not done it) is how you would move the center of mass.
-dustin
professional engineer
certified solidworks professional
certified cosmosworks designer specialist
certified solidworks advanced sheet metal specialist

to clarify, on the real part, the center of mass may not be in the center of the volume. in the solidworks model, using cbl's method, the center of mass would be in the volume center.
-dustin
professional engineer
certified solidworks professional
certified cosmosworks designer specialist
certified solidworks advanced sheet metal specialist

thank you guys. i knew it was something simple like that.
the cog can also be specified in the tools > mass properties > assigned mass properties section.

awesome... i was wondering about that... i am still stuck in 2006.
-dustin
professional engineer
certified solidworks professional
certified cosmosworks designer specialist
certified solidworks advanced sheet metal specialist
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】looking for help debugging hatch macro please yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-12 09:34 PM
【转帖】creating a reference poin on a surface yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-12 08:36 PM
【转帖】batch printing as pdfs from a list bo yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-12 08:16 PM
【转帖】draw shaft using visual basic application yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-12 06:01 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:17 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多