几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 11:51 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 z-purlin specs

z-purlin specs
since i work for the federal government, i have to specify products as generically as possible for competitive bidding purposes. with that said, i specified a z-purlin using the aisi manual for cold formed steel design, thinking that it's like the aisc steel manual and everyone in the purlin making business had comparible products. well, you know what they say about "assume."
i called aisi and asked them why they have these lenthy tables which use z-purlin designations that no one else in the industry uses. they said that they did their best to create a representative sample. what the heck is that!
so, how do you all specify z-purlins without referring to any one specific manufacturer?
check out our whitepaper library.
when i specify steel deck and studs i have the same problem. for dsa work i specify a particular manufacturer and "or equal". to make sure you get an "equal" you may have to specify gage thickness and "s" & "i". the only other method is to specify loading and deflection criteria and any special considerations you might be looking for.
in california we can specify a minimum of three manufacturers and call it good.
old ca se
mudflaps,
yeah, looks like i'll have to go manufacturer-specific and use the old "or equal" clause. 99% of the time, the contractor gives us what we ask for anyway.
i just don't understand aisi though. i must have contacted four or five manufacturers across the country and they all use the same designation system. i get so frustrated with these standards organizations that make up their own stuff thinking that the industry will follow them, kind of like the federal government requiring projects to be designed using metric.
the other reason i used the aisi manual was because the ibc requires the use of aisi-nas for cold formed steel. i guess i figured aisi knew what they were doing.
i went back and read the aisi manual and there was a statement which says, "this naming convention is not an industry standard. individual manufacturers and industry groups have adopted their own systems, and these systems should be used when specifying actual products." i don't understand why aisi devoted so much time and effort to develop these tables if they aren't used by anyone else but them. aisi is suppose to be an industry standardization organization.
could you just specify the loads acting on the purlins, their centres, and any specific requirements you have, and ask for contractors proposals with their tender documentation / submission?
vb
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
structural specs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 11:39 AM
roof purlin eccentricity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 07:27 PM
equivalent udl for purlin design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:49 PM
what specs should i be concerned abou huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:59 PM
【转帖】what specs should i be concerned abou yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:19 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:21 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多