几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 07:59 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】flatness requirement and callout questions

flatness requirement and callout questions
i designed a plate in which some areas inside are hollow. the plate is 31.0" x 22.5". it is made of two .100" thick aluminum alloy 6061 plates vacuum brazed together; the overall thickness i specified is .200+/-.005".
the flatness i specified on both surfaces is as follows:
unrestrained condition
.025" global
.002" per 1.00 x 1.00 local
restrained condition
.010 global
my question is: does the flatness requirement make sense?
hwl
eng-tips forums is member supported.
is the flatness called out on each piece or after they are brazed together?
chris
systems analyst, i.s.
solidworks 06 4.1/pdmworks 06
autocad 06
your +/-.005 size tolerance is at the limit of mil (stock)tolerances for the 2 sandwiched sheets, allowing no room for machining to hold the specified flatness, thus distortion due to braze heating and braze material thickness must be accommodated within your parameters. a welding expert could answer this better as to amount of possible distortion, but flatness is normally considered to be within the size tolerance and perfect form at mmc. it appears your not thinking about asme y14.5 form limits, but that is what i am referring to.
chris,
my drawing only shows the brazed assembly and have the flatness callout on both sides. i don't have separate drawings for the individual piece.
hwl
i did specify the flatness within the size tolerance .010", but it is under restrained condition. did i do it right?
did you start with mil stock finish or ground plate stock? unless the plate stock had some preprocess you might have trouble holding that local flatness callout after brazing.
best regards,
heckler
sr. mechanical engineer
sw2005 sp 5.0 & pro/e 2001
dell precision 370
p4 3.6 ghz, 1gb ram
xp pro sp2.0
nvidia quadro fx 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)
never argue with an idiot. they'll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience every time.
heckler,
by the sound of it, he wants it to be hollow, sealed and flat. if he specifies the flatness after all fabrication, then the fabricator will have to figure something out. yet another problem is that i do not think there is a .100" mill size. the nearest one is .102" (10 gauge).
if the fabricator works with two pieces of .125" sheet, they can meet thickness specifications and flatness by milling off both faces.
we should specify what we want, not how it is made.
leung2005,
when i do crazy stuff like this, i take a close look at all my tolerances. if you back off your thickness tolerance a little, it might make it easier to hit your flatness. at least, it shows the fabricator what your priorities are.
you are specifying the flatness for both unrestrained and restrained condition. i do not know what you are doing with this, but it seems to me it functions in one state or the other. the tolerances only matter in that state. read section 6.8 in asme y14.5m-1994. this very topic is discussed.
otherwise, your flatness specification makes sense to me.
jhg
the manufacturer will start with two thick plates, machine to make pockets on each plate and braze them together, then machine the outside surfaces to make the final product .200+/-.005" thick.
this plate will be attached to an electronic assembly using screws, ~70 of them. the complete assembly will be slided into a slot. under the worst condition, the air gap between the plate to the wall of slot is only .025". i have been thinking the flatness requirement under the non-restrained condition is not really important and necessary. what i care is the flatness under restrained condition and the plate won't hit the wall. right?
hwl
leung2005,
it appears to me that your requirement is to maintain an air gap of .025". is there a flatness requirement in addition to this?
if you specify an overall thickness tolerance of +/-.005" and you clamp your part to something flat, you have a flatness tolerance of .01". you should not specify flatness unless you have a requirement different from .01".
this could go either way. a flatness specification of .001" says you are not absolutely concerned about the thickness, you need it flat. the fabricator can make another machining pass if necessary.
a flatness of .05" in the free state says that you need the thickness, and that you can tolerate waviness. this may be what you require. a thickness of .200" is not very rigid. if your part is attached with ~70 screws to something flat to .005" and rigid, it will flatten out to within .015".

jhg
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:15 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多