几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 08:11 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】gdt tolerencing on circularity and conc shaftcyl

gd&t tolerencing on circularity and conc shaft/cyl
it has been awhile since i had to figure tolerances and clearances with gd&t and i've forgotten the cylinder/shaft rule.
i have a shaft/cyl combo with circularity at .002 and conc at .002. can you remind me how to consider this with my mmc. most are clearing with a good measure but one is only clearing with .001 and i have yet to add the gd&t. it has just been too long and my mind is a blank.
thanks
find a job or post a job opening
neither concentricity nor circularity constrain size! if you are analyzing clearance you might want to consider size!
paul
thanks
i know that mmc does not apply but it has been so long that i don't remember whether they affect my tolerance requirement. i have a .001 shaft and cylinder clearance at mmc- just what i want- i don't remember if i have to take into account the gd&t tolerance. such as do i have to add .001 to my hole and subtract .001 from my shaft if the gd&t tolerance is .002? or does it not affect my clearance?
if your drawing declares that asme y14.5 is its standard then the form tolerance size for both the shaft and cylinder must be perfect (zero) at mmc (unless controled otherwise for straightness. circularity could then only be a refinement of form for any given size.
if your drawing declares that iso is its standard then the form tolerance size for both the shaft and cylinder must be perfect (zero) at mmc only when modified with (e) "the envelope principle" otherwise the mmc size is constrained by other form tolerances i.e. straightness, circularity, etc.
concentricity only controls location in both standards although it does so differently in each.
paul
error... where i stated "...form tolerance size for both..." i meant "...form tolerance for both..."
paul
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:40 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多