几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 08:37 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】iso 406

iso 406
i am reading iso 10110 on how to prepare optical drawings. it says that drawings must be dimensioned and toleranced as per the iso 406 standard. it looks like i am going to have to buy a copy.
i have heard weird things about iso gd&t. is anyone here familiar with it? is the standard reasonably self-contained, or am i going to have to look for other stuff in addition to it, as with iso 10110?
jhg
almost all iso standards contain a "normative references" section up front, listing other iso standards that are "...indespensible for the application of this document."
almost always the first one listed is a glossary document.
seems like a scheme to sell more standards.
mintjulep,
that was part of the weirdness i was hearing about.
i paid my thirty bucks. iso 406 is a simplified version of asme y14.5m-1994, chapter_2. it allows the specification of dimensions on assembled parts. it says nothing about geometry. the asme standard allows the iso tolerance symbols like h6 and f7 on metric dimensions.
it appears that there is an iso 129 out there somewhere, on techical drawings -- dimensioning -- general principles...
all in all, it makes an excellent case for the asme standard.
jhg
it would be contrary to standard practice for the standards boards to standardise on a standard set of standards.
the iso standards for drafting & dimensioning are fragmented into individual documents to cover each sub-topic. it makes it extremely expensive to amass the entire set of relevant standards. asme is far better, though it also has some fragmentation (i.e. y14.41, the casting & forging standard, the gage & fixture standard, ...)
iso's gd&t has a number of other idiosyncracies as well. it allows you to use an axis line as a datum feature. it indicates the mathematical mean of the surface as the datum surface (great for cmms, lousy for traditional inspection methods).
the best explanation of the differences between asme & iso for gd&t is that asme is based on the physical reality whereas iso is based in the mathematical theory.
jim sykes, p.eng, gdtp-s
profile services
cad-documentation-gd&t-product development
in the uk when they went to the iso they replaced bs 308 which was a single document with bs8888.
bs8888 essentially is a list of all the relevant (or in some cases not so relevant) isos, bs, ens etc.
when we got our full copy with all the listed docs it filled 3-4 ring binders (the 2.5" ones if i recall) and was so awkward to use and had so much irrelevant stuff that if probably got used less, and hence was less useful than, the old 308.
i don't know how much it was but it wasn't cheap.
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:25 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多