几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-04, 05:43 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 datum pattern dimensioning

datum pattern dimensioning
when you have a pattern of holes as a datum, do the dimensions for other features come from the centerplane derived from the pattern, or from the center of one of the holes? i've been searching around and i keep finding it done both ways, are both ways really allowed? i believe inspection is done by establishing the centerplane, so i'm inclined to assume that dimensioning to the centerplane is the way to go.
find a job or post a job opening
given that the pattern will be located with basic dimensions, so no tolerance stack as such, then it doesn't really matter does it?
if inspection is going to establish center plane(s) then dimensioning from that might save a little math but that's about it.
it's a bit like when you locate a hole pattern from an edge. you can either go from the edge to each hole, or from the edge to the first hole, then from that hole to the next etc. the schemes have advantages & disadvantages in different stages of the design & manufacturing process.
kenat,
saving a little math was the only practical reason i could think of, but since i'm not experienced i figured i better consult with the masterminds. i also thought since the centerplane is what goes into establishing the drf, technically this is what you should dimension from.
kenat is right. it makes no difference how the basic dimensions are laid out. the only requirement is that there must be a way to calculate the true position of the considered feature - in other words, the nominal displacements from the datum features to the considered feature. if you need to add or subtract basic dimensions in order to calculate the dimension that you need, that is allowed.
this is related to the often-discussed issue of where the "datum axis" or "datum center planes" or "origin" of a pattern of holes is. to me, it is arbitrary - the designer can pick a particular origin or let the inspector pick one. as kenat said, different schemes have advantages and disadvantages to different users of the drawing. but functionally they are all identical.
evan janeshewski
axymetrix quality engineering inc.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
datum dimensioning huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:41 PM
【转帖】hatching entities yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 12:01 PM
【转帖】a hatch problem yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 03:07 PM
【转帖】ordinate dimensions to define gdt datum structure yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:04 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:39 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多