几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 10:25 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 drafting standard

drafting standard??
i have a basic mechanical rod consisting of several parts that is manufactured at a machine shop. my techincal drawing is about 15 years old, but covers everything i need (gd&t is fine). the quality assurance director at my office wants me to highlight or bold certain dimensions and tolerances so that the machine shop knows that these are "key" dimensions. is it common practice to specify a technical drawing in this manner? i argued that every dimension is critical and should be verified within tolerances. if i highlight certain dimensions, wouldnt the machine shop focus on those and not others to save time? im a young engineer, so any help would be appreciated.
eng-tips forums is member supported.
oh dear what have you started.
the quality assurance director is incorrect here. what he really wants to know is the function and relationship of the part and how it is used during the assembly.
qa will require a control plan for this part and one does not want to spend time and $$ checking on a regular basis features (characteristics) that are not important to its function.
do not highlight this information on the drawing but give the qa department a "feel" of the product.
the thread kenat ref is good.
chris
solidworks 06 5.1/pdmworks 06
autocad 06
quote:
if they want to reduce inspection from 100% of all inspections they should use a technique such as statistical.
sorry, should be:
if they want to reduce inspection from 100% of all dimension on all items they should use a technique such as statistical.
when i worked in the automotive industry they used a symbol to designate critical features as 'key product characteristics' (example: daimlerchrysler used a diamond symbol adjacent to the dimension on the drawing). any feature designated as a kpc was required to be statistically controlled with a minimum cpk of 1.33.
that said, i always felt it was a bad practice to designate criticals.
promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
(add stickiness to your site by linking to this professionally managed technical forum)
title: drafting standards,
description: drafting standards, gd&t & tolerance analysis technical support forum and mutual help system for engineering professionals. selling and recruiting forbidden.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
datum reference style old new on y14.5m standard drawing huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:44 PM
asme y14.5m application and general drafting stds huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 04:51 PM
【转帖】what are the guidelines to create a new standard yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:13 AM
【转帖】decimal dimensioningfractional equivalents yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:00 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多