几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 12:20 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 profile control of datum

profile control of datum
please see the attached drawing.
i am using asme y14.5-2009, i think the '94 version would have "two surfaces" in place of my "2x", but anyway...
profile of a surface requires the true profile to be established with basic dimensions. i can't find anything in the standard that overrides this rule when the surface is a datum as i have shown. i don't want the .500 width to be basic, i just want those 2 edges to be within .005 and to establish datum b.
is it acceptable the way i have it?
for whatever reason, the back edges of the tabs are missing. the .500 dimension is the width of the tab.
i'm only familiar with -94 so can't say about the 2x and it's difficult to be sure as some of the lines & dimensions are missing but i think this is ok.
there are some very explicit examples in the 94 standard for using surface profile to control coplanarity and even as setting that as a datum. i'd assume 09 is the same so take another look if you haven't already.
you're setting the 'under side' of the tabs as your b datum. the .500 doesn't come into making the datum or not. the .500 (should maybe be 2x) is locating the top edge of the tab from datum b.
all other features in that orientation should be dimensioned (directly or indirectly) from b unless you have something funny going on.
kenat,
here's a better image.
i would do something to clarify the two surface profile segments that the control is intended for.
attached is one example but there are other ways to do it as well.
paul
paul, i'm sorry but i don't find your sketch a clarification, if anything it's more confusing to me.
jlang's repost appears pretty clear to me, very similar to figure 6-20 in the 94 spec. the phantom line makes it clear which 2 surfaces it applies to, although there should be a break between the phantom line & the geometry line.
i'm not sure about the "2x" but the op implies this is a 2009 thing.
kenat,
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
datum shif huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:45 PM
datum setup huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:45 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
mathematical definition of dimensioning and tolerance principles AS<E Y14.5. M - 1994 huangyhg American standards 3 2008-07-03 09:20 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:12 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多