几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » ISO standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 07:15 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 manufacture qualification to norsok

manufacture qualification to norsok
norsok approved manufacturer mds650.
we are flange manufacturer with production facilities in india and uk. regular quality standards such as is0 9001, ad merkblatt w0, and ped certification are very straightforward to get approvals for.
we want approval to norsok mds 650 - in order to access norwegian market. where do we start / the content and application of the standards isn't a problem - it's just getting the certificate - who does it?
any help finding the start point would be most appreciated - we have already drawn a blank with tuv?
if one looks through m-650, one sees that there are numerous requirements sprinkled through the document. one of these requirements, stated in 8.3.1, is to have the selection of qualification samples and test pieces agreed between the 'purchaser and the manufacturer'. this implies that, in the first instance, there must be a purchaser which appears to rule out an ad hoc qualification if a strict approach is adopted. has the value of this certification process been evaluated by your company; and, is certification absolutely imperative for supply to the norwegian market? looking at the tangled mess of m-650, i'm not sure that it's worth the paper it's written on. if you believe that it is worth proceeding, it will be necessary to engage a third party organisation to witness sampling and testing as the test results are to be documented in accordance with en 10204 3.1c (sic), meaning 3.2 as it is now. as to this party also issuing a qualification certificate, i doubt that they will do this because the standard places the onus on the manufacturer to maintain the qualification test record (qtr).
steve jones
materials & corrosion engineer
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:33 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多