几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-06, 10:21 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 930-11 78 lvl to steel beam connection

(3)-11 7/8 lvl to steel beam connection?
what is the best way to connect (3)-1 3/4x11 7/8 lvl to w10 beam? let's say the connection need to support 4kips. i cant really use top flange simpson hanger on 2x nailer because thats too weak. do i have to use face mount hanger on web pack? how do i secure the web pack and how long?
i have the c-2006 simpson catalog and on pages 100 and 101 i see top-flange hangers that go over 6300 pounds. these have the option of being welded directly to the steel instead of using a nailer. do those not work for you?
but then i need 10 3/8" hanger to make the top justified with the 2x nailer.
why not go to a w12 to match the lvl dimension?
cause i need a 2x nailer to nail all the i joists. shall i start using web packed w12 instead and use face mount?
is that what you do on your projects ucfse?
if you use a face mount and use wood blocking out to the edge of the web, you'll be loading your wide flange with torsion. that'll probably kill it and you'll need a much larger beam. then again, that's the same as using a hanger weled to the edge of the flange.
i don't do a lot of wood framing myself. these are things i would try first. you can create a hanger or bucket out of steel plate and make whatever you want. that's the nice thing about steel: welding.
yeah, i think that what i will do. i am just frustrated how you can connect (3)-lvl so easily to wood but not to steel.
another question ucfse, if the design load is not really a factor, which option is better/cheaper for residential do you think? 2 angles bolted to the w10 web, 2 angles welded (shop/field) to the web.
it's hard to say. i think a residential contractor would not want to deal with welding, but then a field-welded connection will offer more in terms of adjustability for error. drilling the beam in the field for bolt holes would be difficult and shop drilling could cause a problem if something is installed out of alignment. if you can and the time is in your budget, i would put some options on there for the connection and let the contractor choose. being conservative with the connection is probably a good choice as well.
i find most residential buildings want nothing to do with welding in the field. too much trouble to get a welder out there at that time during construction. the project could be delayed for that. usually they request a web pack. in your case i would go with the w10 shape (the w12 may be too deep for the 11 7/8") and they want something to nail the floor sheathing to. the detail i use is web packing of about 2ft with 2 thru bolts each end.

is it easy to drill holes for the bolts in the field? do you use the bolts just to secure the web packing and let it bear on the bottom flange, or do you design the bolts to take all the weight?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM
【转帖】ado.net access操作方法 yang686526 ObjectARX(VB.NET/C#) 0 2009-04-19 09:37 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:36 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多