几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-06, 10:24 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 1 minimum in concrete columns what is the theory

1% minimum in concrete columns? what is the theory?
hello fellow engineers,
question 1 of 2:
our aci code specifies a minimum 1% steel in columns so that we don't have catastrophic failures such as in the pakistan earthquake last year. i believe the minimum 1% is in there to provide 3 fold protection:
1) ductility in the ends and joints, where rotation & hinges could occur.
2) 12% reserve axial strength if the concrete deteriorates at a joint.
3) reserve moment capacity for unpredicted lateral forces.
do you agree? are there other reasons?
question 2 of 2:
"foundations" only require 0.5% steel, but if say a column continues down to a deeper foundation pad, is it correct to say that the column above grade is a "column" while the column below grade is a "foundation." obvious, the soil does provide some confinement, and if it suddenly lost it's strength due to liquification, you'd probably have much bigger problems. and besides, you're not supposed to have hinging in your foundations anyway.
what do you think?
1. check out the aci commentary for a discussion of the rationale for minimum reinforcing. creep and shrinkage resistance is a main reason.
2. the interface between the column and the foundation only requires 0.5% steel. if the column continues below grade, it still needs 1%.
i had the same question many years ago. i looked up the original research that was done in the 30's, if i re
and 1.0 is a nice....round.....number....
based on my 1995 aci 318 section 10.8.4 if the column section is "oversized" you could reduce the reinforcing to 0.5%. i never exactly understood what oversized meant. my ram advanse program flags 1% as a min. nice thread.
according to the commentary to aci 9.2, "oversized" means every column larger than neccesary.
say you need a 14"x14" column with 4#7 to carry an axial force, but the architect requires a 24"x24" column. your minimum steel is based on 1% of the 14x14, and .5% of the 24x24, or 2.88in2.
oops, i meqant the commentary to 10.8
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】concrete formslab floor layou yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:02 PM
【转帖】objectarx&dummies教程(三b)——minimum application using arxwizard yang686526 ObjectARX(C++) 0 2009-04-16 10:36 AM
【转帖】objectarx&dummies教程(三a)——minimum application yang686526 ObjectARX(C++) 0 2009-04-16 10:36 AM
【转帖】i need to print the minimum radius yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-13 12:08 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:09 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多