几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 08:43 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 4 by 4 angle 14

4" by 4 " angle 1/4 "
since the angle has equal legs the sort answer is no, but:
1. welding the angle to the side of the studs induces excentric loading to the stud. you have to look at the condition of the stud: its length, is it braced at the top?, stud gage etc.
2. welding to steel studs is an art, it is very easy to burn right through and leave no support. so, not only do you have to calculate the loading to correctly size the weld, it has to be performed in the field correctly.
3. the best detail is if you can put the angle on top of the studs, then the load is transfered to the stud vertically. that is not always possible, especially if the truss bearing has to slope along the wall.
just some things to consider.
you say that the trusses weigh 45 pounds. however, you should consider what they support as well, unless they are purely decorative.
wldr (visitor)21 jun 02 20:19
thanks for reply...jheidt...trussdoc. does the orientation of the angle ( seat up or seat down ) make a difference in the amount of weight the angle can carry? does it deflect the same amount loaded one way or the other?
isn't l4x4x1/4 kind of large to be welding to 16 ga studs?
the angle has different strengths depending on its orientation and load direction. in general, it is strongest with a flat top and one leg vertically down, when loaded vertically downwards.
deflection will be the same whether the orientation is leg up or leg down.
hope this helps.
wldr (visitor)22 jun 02 10:22
thanks haynewp and sven...i was following detail by using l4x4...i thought it was large also...however, my installers put it in leg up, seat down instead of leg down seat up...
i can't see that the leg up or leg down makes any difference structurally, if the applied load is parrallel to the leg. it may make a difference esthetically, if they are trying to hide the leg above a ceiling etc.
again, i go back to the real "weak" point of the system which is the excentrically loaded welded connection to the steel studs. it is the same condition with leg up or leg down, but the key is a structurally sound weld.
wldr (visitor)23 jun 02 20:29
hey jheidt 2543...thanks again...awesome web site...appreciate the info
hi wldr.
some authorities will tell you that there is a structural difference between putting the vertical leg up and putting it downwards (as sven has said previously).
there is a basic problem of local plate buckling if the maximum compression is at the toe of the vertical leg.
the australian code (which is pretty hot on most aspects of buckling) specifies a reduced moment capacity for any plate element of a rolled steel section restrained at one edge and with maximum compression at the opposite edge which has b/t > 9 (ie outstand/thickness, which is 15 for your angle). if the steel is anything better than basic mild steel, the restriction is more severe.
if you have any doubt, ask yourself what would happen if your section was only 1/8 or 1/16 inch thick (or try a simple cardboard scale model - that will demonstrate the basic problem).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:53 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多