几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:15 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 adequacy of existing masonry bearing wall for residential ad

adequacy of existing masonry bearing wall for residential ad
the other day i received a call to come out and see a house to which the owner is putting an addition on. the addition consists of adding a second story to one side of the house. the current wall consists of a 4" cmu wall with face brick facade. i am not the eor, the drawings were put together by an architect. apparently, the architect assumed the walls were 2x4 framed and the drawings reflect this. the owner called me for my opinion because the contractor brought up the issue of adding a 2x4 stud wall on top of the existing 4" cmu wall. the contractor was concerned with the stability. the drawings instruct the contractor build the 2x4 wall on top of the cmu wall (in bearing), then remove the face brick, and rebrick the entire two stories. personally, i don't feel comfortable with this situation and may recommend building a 2x4 wall adjacent to the existing 4" cmu wall to support the wall above. has anyone had an experience with this? i've only seen a 4" cmu wall act as a bearing wall in a residence once. also, would you consider the face brick to aid in resisting out of plane bending? i typically would not, but in this case maybe some credit can be taken...but again this is unconservative.
check out our whitepaper library.
a 4" cmu wall is too thin to be considered a bearing wall. the architect should be requested to provide revised details as his initial assumption of a framed wall was incorrect.
face brick does not aid in resisting out of plane bending unless it is properly tied to the masonry so that it effectively increases the moment of inertia of the wall.
has anyone determined that the foundation is adequate to support a second storey?
i would be careful about recommending anything on this project unless you are prepared to assume full responsibility for the entire design.
ba
i agree with baretired.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
i agree
shotcrete concrete against the brick (brick serves as backform). dig along and add a new footing. this should also allow you to add sill plate bolts to the top of the concrete wall, and then provide easy attachment of new facade.
indepth,
your advice is not only confusing, it is probably dangerous. ba has given the appropriate advice.
hokie is correct here.
shotcrete, although it will increase the cross sectional area of the wall, does nothing for the reinforcing, assumuing that there is any at all. none has been alluded to in the 4" cmu wall.
to assume here is dangerous.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
8 masonry back-up to 4 brick wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:58 AM
27 feet high brick 9clay0 masonry wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:33 AM
20 high basement wall and diaphragm huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:23 AM
【转帖】rendering On Existing Mfc Device Conte yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 02:57 PM
【转帖】adtdirect wall geometry yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 03:52 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:37 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多