几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 12:52 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 as 2870 residential and footing construction

as 2870 residential and footing construction
as 2870 is a standard code for residential strip footing design in australia. i take a look some structural drawings, i see that it is likely that the structural engineer doesn't follow what the code said and he has got his own standard and design.
for example, the section of a largest internal strip footing can be 600x600mm with 6l12tm (top and bottom) for a 2-storey residential building at site class m (bearing capacity 200kpa). the external edge strip footing is 450x600mm (600mm in depth) with 4l12tm (top and bottom). these dimension and trench mesh is not shown in the code.
i read an australian book for strip footing design which is similar to pad footing design. but i cannot get the practical results ( e.g. the width is much less than 600mm).
i maybe have a wrong calculation or haven't undertood the code yet ???. any idea ? thanks.
happy new year.

as 2870 does contain some standard designs that are 鈥渄eemed to comply鈥?with the code requirements but you are not necessarily limited to those designs. the engineer (or designer) can also design to engineering principles.
the commentary to as 2870 states that 鈥渢o allow for uneven loading and eccentricity, the minimum allowable bearing pressure is set at 100kpa鈥?for strip footings. typical values for applied pressure under the 鈥渟tandard鈥?strip footings are 50kpa, 65kpa and 80kpa for double storey clad frame, masonry veneer and solid masonry construction respectively. this is because the footings are not just designed for allowable bearing pressure but also for providing sufficient strength and stiffness to accommodate some movement.
with class m soils being moderately reactive, the engineer may be basing the design on previous good performance or to suit current practise in that locality. why don鈥檛 you call him/her to discuss?
for more information try reading the commentary to as 2860 and the references nominated within.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
adequacy of existing masonry bearing wall for residential ad huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:15 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:01 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多