几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 01:13 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 asce 7-05 wind design inten

asce 7-05 wind design intent
what exactly is the intent of the code when it comes to wind design? if your building is designed in a 90mph 3-sec gust zone, should it have absolutely no wind damage if an 89mph wind comes along during a severe storm? obviously, neglect any impacts from flying debris. also, can anyone pinpoint exactly what the wind is at the site if damage occurs?
it is my understanding that the intent is that the building remain completely elastic during a design wind event.
a design that resists the calculated wind forces for a given wind-zone is meant to do just that -- resist the wind forces. the
well, a portion of roofing membrane ripped off during a storm with 80mph straight line winds and confirmed tornadoes in the area, yet the owner claims that since the winds weren't documented above 90mph, the contractor should be held liable. the building is 2 years old.
atomic25,
did the building collapse during the storm? thats the argument. if there is a manufacturers guidline for installing roof membrane, and then it failed, maybe they could be held liable.
thats my thoughts
the winds weren't documented over 80mph? did he have an anemometer right next to the eave? or even 50' from the building? if he didn't, how did he know the wind wasn't 100mph? just because it registered 80mph on an anemometer "in the area" does not mean local velocities can't be significantly higher. there is very little chance he can prove his case. he will lose that one in a u.s. court...
if you "heard" it on the internet, it's guilty until proven innocent. - dcs
the 3-second gust wind speed we use in design is not the same as the wind speed typically reported by meteorologists and weather stations. an 80 mph sustained wind might have gusts over 90 mph. you would have to do more investigating and probably some calculations so that you are comparing apples to apples.
perhaps the owner can file an insurance claim and let the insurance company subrogate it if the contractor truely is responsible.
don phillips
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
asce 7-02 wind load enclosure type opinion huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:04 PM
asce 7 wind torsion loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:00 PM
asce 37-02 construction wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:55 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:54 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多