几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 01:21 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 asce 7-98, section 6.2

asce 7-98, section 6.2
when calculating whether a building is enclosed or partially enclosed, do you take each "side" of the building (by strict definition), even if one side is 5 feet long and another is 200 feet long? should small offsets be included as part of a longer side or as an individual wall?
how about a building that has stepped roof, should the upper wall be included?
how about a building that is connected to another building? to consider as two separate buildings, do the openings have to be air tight (so the pressure is not equalized)?
isn't there a simpler way to do this?
jike...if it has a separate roof section, i would consider it to be a separate building section without regard to its dimensions. asce 7 does not clearly state such, but it seems to be implicit that your example would be dealt with as a separate, attached building section. the definition of partially enclosed would then be checked for each of the exterior walls receiving wind pressure (the "hidden" common wall would not apply, but the remaining three walls would). if it doesn't meet the requirement for partially enclosed, it is then by default, enclosed (as stated in the asce 7 commentary).
for a building with a stepped roof, i would include the upper level of wall in the assessment for that section only, not the lower abutment/offset.
for a building connected to another building, the common wall would not be included in both sections, only one. it is perhaps arguable that if a common wall is shielded by another building section, and the protection for openings in that shielding section fail, then the common wall becomes an exterior wall subject to direct wind loading. i would not generally approach the analysis in this manner but would apply the internal wall requirement for the shielded wall (10 psf).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
asce 7-05 section 6.5.15.1 roof top structures and equipmen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:11 PM
asce 17-96 para. 4.2.5 load combinations seiasce 7-02 com huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:54 PM
section of a section huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 12:48 PM
【转帖】section of a section yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:53 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:30 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多