几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 02:10 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 balanced bridge spans

balanced bridge spans
the term "balanced spans" on multiple span bridges is common, but not well defined.
what is your "rule of thumb" to obtain balanced spans on bridges? where does this come from? do you know of anywhere that i can read up on this?
rule of thumb is that the exterior spans are 75% of the interior span(s).
i have a chart (somewhere)with various configurations but i can't find it. when i do, i'll post it.
number of spans ratio of spans
2 1.0:1.0
3 0.75:1.0:0.75
4 0.80:1.0:1.0:0.80
5 0.60:0.8:1.0:0.8:0.60
bridgebuster gave very good information, i concur with all but the 5 span arrangement.
the stated 5-span arrangement likely results in a "least weight" solution (or very close to it), but it may not be the most economical for today's cost structure.
for a five span structure, you should evaluate the above arrangement as well as the following:
0.8, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 0.8
this will have a slightly higher girder weight but the redundancy of details can save significant cost (at least in steel bridges).
the term "balanced spans" or "balanced span arrangement" refers to the proportions of end span to interior span that generally result in consistent max. negative moment (+-5-10% at piers) and positive moments (+-5-10%). it is just a vague term that might also be stated "in normal circumstances" or something else to that effect.
you may take it for granted that this would occur universally, but because of utilities or other obstacles, severly unbalanced span arrangements are more and more common. i even recall a project where an interior span never experienced positive moment.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
arema rating steel bridge load combinations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:50 PM
anybody deal with one u-section-beam bridge huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:24 PM
another minn bridge with problem gussets huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:16 PM
aashto bridge design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:20 AM
1865 bridge photo huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:36 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:51 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多