几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 03:16 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 bearing perp to grain

bearing perp to grain
i'm curious to get some other opinions on exceeding compression bearing perpendicular to the grain stresses on bottom stud wall plates. it seems to be more of a serviceability issue than strength issue. does anyone else neglect this limit in some cases?
curious for thoughts/opinions on this matter.

i never neglect it. dont forget you have cb factor that can increase your perpendicular stress capacity a little bit. dont forget sometime you use a different species of wood (i.e. treated hemfir). are you talking about stud pack? just add another so you dont crush the plate.
never, but never question engineer's judgement
this is a 3 story wood building and i have typical bottom plates on my bearing walls that aren't working. my detail has 2 bottom plates above sheathing, above a rim joist running parallel with the wall and floor joists perpendicular to the wall. i could add a 2nd rim joist but on the firts floor that still doesn't help. i'm already using souther pine no. 2 which has 565 psi with a 1.5 cb factor.
maybe having 2 bottom plates help spread the load?
never, never, never.
it leads to crushing of the plates and finishing damage issues, particularly in sheetrock. not a good condition in condominiums... lawyers love us to do that though! it pays their bills.
i use either more studs or, as a last resort, steel bearing plates, so as not to exceed the valus.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
double bottom plates will not do anything. it will still crush it. are you using 2x6 studs @ 16" o.c.? the perpendicular bearing is not good enough? maybe you should use an engineered wood product for the bottom plates. that will solve it.
never, but never question engineer's judgement
agree with others. you need to use a different material for the plate or spread the load.
tighten up your stud spacing or even use 3x studs, i know some liberal engineers who don't flirt with plate crushing.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
bearing on brick veneer a no-no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:15 PM
bearing capacitypressure of existing asphal huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:15 PM
bearing capacity of thru-bolts on brick huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:14 PM
asphalt pavement bearing capacity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:39 PM
allowable bearing capacity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:51 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:10 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多