huangyhg

bleacher design
i am currently working on a project for a local university. the project includes the design of an aluminum bleacher/grandstands. my question is for those who have designed bleachers, what typically is the design dead load?
other than the main beams and stringers (structural steel) all other components are aluminum. are there any guidelines? i did not find anything in asce, ibc or icc 300.
the bleacher manufacturer has used 100 psf as a reference for dead load in the past. that seems rather high!
any info would be appreciated.

check out our whitepaper library.
the dead load is what it is. the live load i would use is 100, people jam pack bleachers sometimes, and standing, sitting, they are tight.
that's what i figured. it is what it is! just didn't know if there was a standard of sorts.
thanks
per asce 7 - bleacher live load = 100 psf
i once interviewed with a bleacher manufacturer for a position. they had no engineers on staff and wanted to get an engineer in to do full blown analyses, finite elements, etc. to fine tune their bleacher designs.
i asked the guy how they came up with the design they currently used and he stated that they built prototypes, loaded them up with sand bags until the bleacher collapsed, then added up the weight to see how well it did.
i didn't take the job and always after that felt a little uneasy sitting on high school bleachers.

design loads.
1. live load: 100 psf gross horizontal projection.
2. lateral sway load: 24 plf seat planks.
3. perpendicular sway load: 10 plf seat planks.
4. live load, seat and tread planks: 120 plf.
5. guard rail load:
a. vertical load: 100 plf.
b. horizontal load: 50 plf.
c. point load: 200 pounds.
6. wind load: per local building code (if outside)
for capacity use 18" per person
international building code (ibc) of the international code council (icc) lists requirements for
guardrails:
guardrails are required on open sides which are more than 30 inches above the floor or grade below. guards must be at least 42 inches high, measured vertically above the leading edge of the tread, adjacent walking surface, or adjacent seatboard.
open guards shall have balusters or ornamental patterns such that a 4-inch diameter sphere cannot pass through any opening up to a height of 34 inches. from a height of 34 inches to 42 inches above the adjacent walking surfaces, a
sphere of 8 inches in diameter shall not pass.
openings:
where footboards are more than 30 inches above grade, openings between the seat and footboards shall not allow the passage of a sphere greater than 4 inches.
when projected on a horizontal plane, horizontal gaps shall not exceed 0.25 inch between footboards and seatboards. at aisles, horizontal gaps shall not exceed 0.25 inch between footboards.
boo1...nice.
thanks...
it's actually pretty scary. the company that i am checking these bleachers out for pretty much told me that all of there bleachers in the past are built from "industry standard". all of the main beams, stringers, columns, braces and even footings are just copied and pasted into each project without any review. i hope whomever set the "industry standard" was conservative with his designs?
just until recentlly i have reviewed a few of there more "complicated" projects.
i was familiar with the live loads and horizontal loads per asce and icc 300. the contractor asked me if there was a "typical" dead load for bleachers. but thanks for the replies.
boo1 is quite correct.
however - if this going to europe - i would double the numbers.
those soccer(football) fans are just plain nuts....
would finite element analysis (fea) techniques can be apropriate to model the modes of vibration or natural frequencies of structure? is ada access required?

thanks for the replies.
one other question. the wind load design. what category if any would this fit under in asce 7? it is not an open building or a solid freestanding wall or solid sign? the only other category is other structures. however, when calculating the value of cf it does not fit into any of the figures 6-12 thru 6-23. any insight?
i have been involved in the design of two major grandstands here in new zealand, as well as several smaller stands such as the one you are currently building. these are absolute monsters; they are prone to fatigue (specific checks must be undertaken), prone to horrendous vibration problems (again, specific checks required), prone to collapse (very common in the smaller stands), and prone to exposure problems. they're one of the few structures i can think of that you can actually have full loads on one side, with everyone jumping up and down, and an empty stand on the other side.
regarding wind design most codes would deem this to be a special or unique structure requiring advanced computer modeling or scale model wind tunnels. obviously that's not going to work for your small project, so i would just advise being as caution and conservative as possible. the local joint standard (as/nzs 1170) actually does a pretty good job with grandstands... might be worth getting a copy for your project. it is an excellent code with a detailed commentary.
i cannot recall off the top of my head whether it deals specifically with grandstand wind loading, however i know that it does the cantilevering roofs above in wind.
if you can't get anyone to assist with your own code, i'd be happy to dig up some notes and post something for you.
cheers,
ys

b.eng (carleton)
working in new zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...

__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]