几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 05:25 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 buckling lenght factor

buckling lenght factor
hi all
i have a question about buckling lenght factor for steel column.
i have building which is 9 storys height with moment resistant frame(mrf) on one direction and bracing on the other direction both are for lateral loads resistance.
there is a column which is a part of the moment resiatnce frame and on the other direction it is supported by x bracing and a steel beam at floor level(shear connection)
so i have assumed buckling lenght factor for column in direction of x bracing to be 1.
and i calculated buckling lenght factor for the column in the direction of the moment resiatnce frame using aligment charts.
the column is hinged on base. i got k=3.5!!
first question. using k factor=1 for direction of bracing is ok?
second question, i do not feel ok by using kfactor=3.5! in direction of moment resiatnce france because this will lead to extremely big section. so shall i assume k factor on mrf direction=2?
thanks all
answer to first question: yes.
answer to second question: 3.5 sounds awfully high--did you use g = 10 for the pinned base? if so, your girder is probably not stiff enough, and the building would sway too much, anyway. a stiffer girder would be in order.
daveatkins
the alignment charts are developed based upon "elastic" buckling. for columns with kl/r less than c'c, this is not a correct assumption. see example 3, pg 3-6 thru 3-7 and table a on pg. 3-8, 9th edition, aisc manual for the "inelastic" buckling procedure for reducing the k.
i hope this helps!
using k=2 is gives you a place to start when designing so you don't have to randomly pick sizes until you have something reasonable. you should go back and check your assumption by computing the actual k factor with the sizes you've chosen and verify all your numbers. you may have to do a few iterations to arrive at a satisfactory result. if you're getting a k of 3.5 then you probably don't have enough stiffness in your frame anyway, as daveatkins suggested.
well thanks daveathinks and jike for quick reply,
yes i used g=10 for pinned base
jike you are talking about aisc-asd89 as a refrence for this k factor for inelastic buckling?
well jike i checked asd89 and found the example but there is a point not clear yet.
does the reduction factor equal to value fa/f`e?
i have diffrent grade of steel than a36 and a50 that are listed in the table, so what is the soure equation for values listed in the table?
note:- i am using steel with fy=275 mpa
the equations should be listed in the specification section. you may need to convert to ksi to make sure the equations function properly.
well jike fe is function of lenght of member and buckling lenght factor(k) and also raduis of gryation(r), so how can this table be general for any section case?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
buckling column with varying moment of inertia huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:24 PM
bridge loading factor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:12 PM
beam web buckling huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:10 PM
ad load factor in asd huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:22 PM
【转帖】getting correct text size and width factor yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 11:28 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:48 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多