几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 05:45 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 building with iso containers

building with iso containers
anybody have any good structural information on these iso containers (aka shipping containers) and structural modifications to them to make buildings with them?
i'm doing a storage building with these boxes and need to do a structural analysis of these things. we are going about 5 high and will be modifying them to install rollup doors and provide corridors, etc. foundation will consist of drilled concrete piers at the corners and intermediate supports if need be.
i've seen many examples of these boxes being used in construction on the internet, but not much structural information. the best one i've found is in the attached url.
hopefully this thread will generate a lot of useful information on structural design of buildings using iso containers.
thanks for any information you can provide.

five high?
i'd (might) go 3 or 4 high if people are going to be inside/under/around them, but five?

some people are even adding some mods and turning them into "blast" trailers - like near a refinery. sorry - don't have details and i think there are a number of different designs.
thanks racookpe and miketheengineer! i appreciate your feedback and hope more people join in on this topic, since it appears to be a hot new trend in sustainable construction.
at this point i'm preliminarily looking into using the racking test force ratings that these boxes are rated for resistence to lateral loads. see the attached link for more information.
my dilemma is what happens to these "shearwall" capacities when the sides are partially opened up for doors. the other odd thing is that the racking test force for the short direction of a box is about twice the load for the long direction. i would guess this is because the boat rocks more sideways than back to front and would have larger forces in the sideways direction. i would like to think it could be the test force prorated down by the length of wall leftover, but i'm not sure it is that simple.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【分享】最新cax/eda/cfd/gis/光学/化工/液压软件资源网 ghjkop CAM 1 2009-02-16 08:52 AM
【下载】最新cax/eda/cfd/gis/光学/化工/液压软件资源网 ghjkop CMM检测 0 2008-02-29 11:14 AM
【公告】最新cax/eda/cfd/gis/光学/化工/液压软件资源网 ghjkop 软件测试 0 2008-01-14 10:06 PM
【下载】最新cax/eda/cfd/gis/光学/化工/液压软件资源网 ghjkop CAD二次开发 0 2008-01-14 10:06 PM
【推荐】最新cax/eda/cfd/gis/光学/化工/液压软件资源网 ghjkop CMM二次开发 0 2008-01-14 10:05 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:03 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多