几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:16 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 centroid to bridge deck

centroid to bridge deck
this should be simple, but i'm having some troubles. looking through the fhwa lrfd steel bridge design example
i only took a quick look at the example so i can't be positive with my response. the centroid of the deck would include the concrete haunch and the slab. this combination would have a lower centroid than the slab alone (which is what you're calculating).
they may also have included the transformed area of the longitudinal rebar in with the deck. the centroid of this steel is a bit lower that the centroid of the concrete slab. if this is the case then it would also show up in the area (i didn't check).
good luck with the exam.
sorry, since the properties are in steel units the rebar area wouldn't be transformed.

they do consider the steel in the negative moment region, but it it separated from the deck in the table. i wondered about the haunch too, until i read this excerpt before the section properties table:
"for this design example, the slab haunch is 3.5 inches throughout the length of the bridge. that is, the bottom of the slab is located 3.5 inches above the top of the web. for this design example, this distance is used in computing the location of the centroid of the slab. however, the area of the haunch is not considered in the section properties.
some states and agencies assume that the slab haunch is zero when computing the section properties."
i had a closer look and noted that the haunch thickness is measured from the top of the web (see tip - slab haunch) on the previous page. you had measured the haunch from the top of the top flange. that would give you the d of 62.375, ignoring the rebar and haunch area.
doh! thanks for the heads up. i knew it was something simple!!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
building to bridge engineering huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:43 PM
bridge loading factor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:12 PM
bridge deck removal falsework huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:08 PM
bridge deck pouring sequence huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:08 PM
b roof deck vs c floor deck - for floor use huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:07 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:59 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多