几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:31 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 chicago porch

chicago porch
from the chicago tribune:
the owner of the lincoln park building where a porch collapse killed 13 people in june agreed wednesday to pay $112,700 to settle city code violations at 22 buildings he owns.
attorneys for philip pappas and two of his companies agreed to pay $108,500 in the city's case against them for 713 w. wrightwood ave., where the porch collapsed june 29, killing 13 and injuring dozens. pappas also agreed to pay $200 for each of 21 other buildings where the city alleged porches on buildings he owns were constructed in violation of city code or without permits.
an agreeable man ...
but that citizens behave uncivily is no wonder when so many civil servants neither fare very well in mores, and awesome numbers of people get simply off social wealth.
it is the duty of the state to give example to the people and ensuring everyone gets a decent life. then surely will see far less code violations.
i qualify my comment by stating that i don't know anything about this case...$112,700 seems to be an inadequant and lenient penalty if the owner has been negligent is some way.
what value on human life? $8,669 per person?
i am in the same situation as dbuzz. without prejudice i must admit the fine seems nothing in comparison to 13 lives and proven violation of city code.
i am talking of course on the assumption that the loss of lives was a direct consequence of the code violation, based on the impression of dik's report.
it could be a case of simple porch design with minor infringements of the city regulations blown out of proportion after the tragedy but the fact 22 buildings were involved and the design has proved to be a serious risk to the public is not a small matter.
can the american engineers comment if the amount of fine involved is adequate just for paying an idependent structural engineer's investigation, analysis and calculation, reporting and acting as expert witness in the court proceeding for this saga.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
chicago building code huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:30 PM
building a flat porch roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:29 PM
a really tall one in chicago huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:09 AM
2007 chicago building code huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:31 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:27 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多