几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 12:04 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 concrete excavation

concrete excavation
hello again,
i am trying to find areas of maximum internal bending moments in the walls of a concrete structure. the shape of the structure is a rectangular box and is quite massive (about 5m x 7m x 30m). the structure is underground and will experience varying pressures along the side walls. i have modelled this structure using an fea program but i also want to compare those results with hand calculations. what is the best way to approach this problem?
thanks
i don't think you'll find a simple, good solution by hand.
you can take each face individually, treat it as a flat plate, apply whichever of roark's formulas seems to fit the best, and check loading in that way. check it assuming simply supported and with fixed edges, and assume your case is somewhere in between.
you can isolate a section out of the box, treat it as a square frame, and design for bending in that direction.
you can treat the faces as slats running in the short direction, check reinforcing in that direction, then treat as slats crosswise and check reinforcing in that direction.
roark may even have some equations for a rectangular tank which could be applied.
in any case, you may be able to come up with a satisfactory design by hand, but you could have some pretty wide variations between the design and fea model.
this kind of problem is vastly simplified in many cases when the reinforcement required by loading falls below the required minimum areas- then you can make some pretty appoximate, but conservative assumptions, and still have a reasonable design.
isn't this a relatively straightforward box culvert design scenario? just consider a 1m length of box culvert unit and carry out an analysis for all the different loading combinations that you have, and design for the worst case bending moments and shear forces for the walls, roof, and base.
the reinforced concrete designers manual has worked examples for this type of design. (uk publication).
valleyboy
i did look at the reinforced concrete designers manual (not sure what publication) but i was unsure whether or not i could consider this a straightforward rectangular culvert due the massive size of the structure. though sectioning the model into 1m length box culverts may be a fair approximation. i'll try that out.
you should be able to check your fe results against the tables in this book
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
concrete corrosion in partial saturated condition huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:54 AM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM
blinding concrete - specified grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:56 PM
blind concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:56 PM
28 day vs. 56 day concrete breaks huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:34 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:46 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多